Literature DB >> 33201736

Association Between Hospital Debriefing Practices With Adherence to Resuscitation Process Measures and Outcomes for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Ali O Malik1,2, Brahmajee K Nallamothu3, Brad Trumpower1,3, Marci Kennedy, Sarah L Krein3,4, Khaja M Chinnakondepalli2, Vittal Hejjaji1,2, Paul S Chan1,2.   

Abstract

Background Identifying actionable resuscitation practices that vary across hospitals could improve adherence to process measures or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We sought to examine whether hospital debriefing frequency after IHCA varies across hospitals and whether hospitals which routinely perform debriefing have higher rates of process-of-care compliance or survival. Methods We conducted a nationwide survey of hospital resuscitation practices in April of 2018, which were then linked to data from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation national registry for IHCA. Hospitals were categorized according to their reported frequency of debriefing immediately after IHCA; rarely (0%-20% of all IHCA cases), occasionally (21%-80%), and frequently (81%-100%). Hospital-level rates of timely defibrillation (≤2 minutes), epinephrine administration (≤5 minutes), survival to discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurologically intact survival were comparted for patients with IHCA from 2015 to 2017. Results Overall, there were 193 hospitals comprising 44 477 IHCA events. Mean patient age was 65±16, 41% were females, and 68% were of White race. Across hospitals, 84 (43.5%) rarely performed debriefings immediately after an IHCA, 82 (42.5%) performed debriefing sessions occasionally, and 27 (14.0%) performed debriefing frequently. There was no association between higher reported debriefing frequency and hospital rates of timely defibrillation and epinephrine administration. Mean hospital rates of risk-standardized survival to discharge were similar across debriefing frequency groups (rarely 25.6%; occasionally 26.0%; frequently 25.2%, P=0.72), as were hospital rates of risk-adjusted return of spontaneous circulation (rarely 72.2%; occasionally 73.0%; frequently 70.0%, P=0.06) and neurologically intact survival (rarely 21.9%, occasionally 22.2%, frequently 21.1%, P=0.75). Conclusions In a large contemporary nationwide quality improvement registry, hospitals varied widely in how often they conducted debriefings immediately after IHCA. However, hospital debriefing frequency was not associated with better adherence to timely delivery of epinephrine or defibrillation or higher rates of IHCA survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epinephrine; hospitals; quality improvement; resuscitation; survival rate

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201736      PMCID: PMC7678815          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  29 in total

1.  Mental practice: effective stress management training for novice surgeons.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Rajesh Aggarwal; Aidan Moran; Pramudith Sirimanna; Patrice Crochet; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.

Authors:  T Mahmood; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Postoperative video debriefing reduces technical errors in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Giselle G Hamad; Matthew T Brown; Julio A Clavijo-Alvarez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Failure to Debrief after Critical Events in Anesthesia Is Associated with Failures in Communication during the Event.

Authors:  Alexander F Arriaga; Rachel E Sweeney; Justin T Clapp; Madhavi Muralidharan; Randall C Burson; Emily K B Gordon; Scott A Falk; Dimitry Y Baranov; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Hospital strategies for reducing risk-standardized mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Erica S Spatz; Jeph Herrin; Emily J Cherlin; Jeptha P Curtis; Jennifer W Thompson; Henry H Ting; Yongfei Wang; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Delays in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Defibrillation, and Epinephrine Administration All Decrease Survival in In-hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Nicholas G Bircher; Paul S Chan; Yan Xu
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Annual Incidence of Adult and Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States

Authors:  Mathias J. Holmberg; Catherine E. Ross; Garrett M. Fitzmaurice; Paul S. Chan; Jordan Duval-Arnould; Anne V. Grossestreuer; Tuyen Yankama; Michael W. Donnino; Lars W. Andersen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-07-09

8.  Risk-standardizing survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; Robert A Berg; John A Spertus; Lee H Schwamm; Deepak L Bhatt; Gregg C Fonarow; Paul A Heidenreich; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Fengming Tang; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing.

Authors:  Dana P Edelson; Barbara Litzinger; Vineet Arora; Deborah Walsh; Salem Kim; Diane S Lauderdale; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Lance B Becker; Benjamin S Abella
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-26

10.  Hospital variation in survival trends for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Saket Girotra; Peter Cram; John A Spertus; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Yan Li; Philip G Jones; Paul S Chan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.