Literature DB >> 10571707

Quantifying physician teaching productivity using clinical relative value units.

M M Yeh1, D F Cahill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design and test a customizable system for calculating physician teaching productivity based on clinical relative value units (RVUs). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A 550-bed community teaching hospital with 11 part-time faculty general internists.
DESIGN: Academic year 1997-98 educational activities were analyzed with an RVU-based system using teaching value multipliers (TVMs). The TVM is the ratio of the value of a unit of time spent teaching to the equivalent time spent in clinical practice. We assigned TVMs to teaching tasks based on their educational value and complexity. The RVUs of a teaching activity would be equal to its TVM multiplied by its duration and by the regional median clinical RVU production rate. MEASUREMENTS: The faculty members' total annual RVUs for teaching were calculated and compared with the RVUs they would have earned had they spent the same proportion of time in clinical practice. MAIN
RESULTS: For the same proportion of time, the faculty physicians would have generated 29,806 RVUs through teaching or 27, 137 RVUs through clinical practice (Absolute difference = 2,669 RVUs; Relative excess = 9.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: We describe an easily customizable method of quantifying physician teaching productivity in terms of clinical RVUs. This system allows equitable recognition of physician efforts in both the educational and clinical arenas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571707      PMCID: PMC1496754          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.01029.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  10 in total

1.  Medicare and graduate medical education.

Authors:  J K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Using relative value units to measure faculty clinical productivity.

Authors:  T A Albritton; M D Miller; M H Johnson; D W Rahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A relative-value-based system for calculating faculty productivity in teaching, research, administration, and patient care.

Authors:  C Hilton; W Fisher; A Lopez; C Sanders
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Career satisfaction and clinician-educators. The rewards and challenges of teaching. The Society of General Internal Medicine Career Satisfaction Study Group.

Authors:  M S Gerrity; D E Pathman; M Linzer; B D Steiner; L M Winterbottom; M C Sharp; S E Skochelak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Estimating physicians' work for a resource-based relative-value scale.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; D Yntema; E R Becker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Relationship between market competition and the activities and attitudes of medical school faculty.

Authors:  E G Campbell; J S Weissman; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Compensation to a department of medicine and its faculty members for the teaching of medical students and house staff.

Authors:  S Shea; K G Nickerson; J Tenenbaum; T Q Morris; D Rabinowitz; K O'Donnell; E Perez; M L Weisfeldt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Are the teachers teaching? Measuring the educational activities of clinical faculty.

Authors:  C L Bardes; J G Hayes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Part-time faculty in academic medicine: present status and future challenges.

Authors:  W Levinson; K Kaufman; J Bickel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Differences in earnings between male and female physicians.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.

Authors:  T Mahmood; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Capturing Psychologists' Work in Academic Health Settings: The Role of the Educational Value Unit (EVU).

Authors:  Eugene J D'Angelo; Katie Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2016-03

3.  Medical faculties' view about the importance of educational roles.

Authors:  Samaneh Abolbashari; Hossein Karimi Moonaghi; Mojtaba Mousavi Bazzaz
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-06-06

4.  Health Care Policy and Congenital Heart Disease: 2020 Focus on Our 2030 Future.

Authors:  Devyani Chowdhury; Jonathan N Johnson; Carissa M Baker-Smith; Robert D B Jaquiss; Arjun K Mahendran; Valerie Curren; Aarti Bhat; Angira Patel; Audrey C Marshall; Stephanie Fuller; Bradley S Marino; Christina M Fink; Keila N Lopez; Lowell H Frank; Mishaal Ather; Natalie Torentinos; Olivia Kranz; Vivian Thorne; Ryan R Davies; Stuart Berger; Christopher Snyder; Arwa Saidi; Kenneth Shaffer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Advancing Nephrology: Division Leaders Advise ASN.

Authors:  Gregory L Braden; Arlene Chapman; David H Ellison; Crystal A Gadegbeku; Susan B Gurley; Peter Igarashi; Ellie Kelepouris; Marva M Moxey-Mims; Mark D Okusa; Troy J Plumb; Susan E Quaggin; David J Salant; Mark S Segal; Stuart J Shankland; Stefan Somlo
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.