Literature DB >> 19533238

Assessment of early learning curves among nurses and physicians using a high-fidelity virtual-reality colonoscopy simulator.

Irina Kruglikova1, Teodor P Grantcharov, Asbjorn M Drewes, Peter Funch-Jensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been suggested that nurses can perform diagnostic endoscopy procedures, which traditionally have been a physician's responsibility. The existing studies concerning quality of sigmoidoscopy performed by nurses are small, used assessment tools with insufficient validation and to date there is very little knowledge of the learning curve patterns for physicians and nurses. The aim of a present study was to assess early learning curves on a virtual-reality colonoscopy simulator of untrained residents as compared with that of nurses with and without endoscopy assistance experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects were included in the study: 10 female residents (median age 30.5 years) without colonoscopy experience, 10 female nurses (median age 27.5 years) without endoscopy assistance experience and 10 female nurses (median age 42 years) with endoscopy assistance experience. All participants performed 10 repetitions of task 6 from the "Introduction" colonoscopy module of the Accu Touch Endoscopy simulator. Eight experienced colonoscopists performed three repetitions of task 6 in order to provide the reference expert level of performance.
RESULTS: All subjects completed the virtual colonoscopy without complications. Significant differences existed between residents and nurses with respect to time to complete the procedure. Residents and nurses showed similar learning curve patterns. There were not significant differences between the groups in terms of volume of insufflated air, percentage of time without discomfort, and percentage of mucosa seen. None of the trainee groups achieved expert proficiency level in terms of time and amount of insufflated air by the tenth repetition.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses performed virtual colonoscopy as accurately and safely as residents. Although the residents performed significantly faster, time differences showed a tendency towards decreasing, and appraisement of the numeric time differences seemed of minor practical importance. From a technical point of view this indicates that nurses may learn to perform colonoscopy after appropriate training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19533238     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0555-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skill training.

Authors:  D A Rogers; G Regehr; T R Howdieshell; K A Yeh; E Palm
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.

Authors:  T Mahmood; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills.

Authors:  Mark C Porte; George Xeroulis; Richard K Reznick; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer.

Authors:  A Eversbusch; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan Cohen; Seth A Cohen; Kinjal C Vora; Xiaonan Xue; J Steven Burdick; Simmy Bank; Edmund J Bini; Henry Bodenheimer; Maurice Cerulli; Hans Gerdes; David Greenwald; Frank Gress; Irwin Grosman; Robert Hawes; Gerard Mullin; Gerard Mullen; Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Anthony Starpoli; Peter Stevens; Scott Tenner; Gerald Villanueva
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  P Schoenfeld; S Lipscomb; J Crook; J Dominguez; J Butler; L Holmes; D Cruess; D Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients.

Authors:  Jason Park; Helen MacRae; Laura J Musselman; Peter Rossos; Stanley J Hamstra; Stephen Wolman; Richard K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Joseph C Kolars; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Lena Carstensen; Svend Schulze
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Medical simulation in respiratory and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Godfrey Lam; Najib T Ayas; Donald E Griesdale; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training.

Authors:  Louis Harpham-Lockyer; Faidon-Marios Laskaratos; Pasquale Berlingieri; Owen Epstein
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 3.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The effect of virtual endoscopy simulator training on novices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Weiguang Qiao; Yang Bai; Ruxi Lv; Wendi Zhang; Yuqing Chen; Shan Lei; Fachao Zhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.