Literature DB >> 15456796

Fast adaptation of the internal model of gravity for manual interceptions: evidence for event-dependent learning.

Myrka Zago1, Gianfranco Bosco, Vincenzo Maffei, Marco Iosa, Yuri P Ivanenko, Francesco Lacquaniti.   

Abstract

We studied how subjects learn to deal with two conflicting sensory environments as a function of the probability of each environment and the temporal distance between repeated events. Subjects were asked to intercept a visual target moving downward on a screen with randomized laws of motion. We compared five protocols that differed in the probability of constant speed (0g) targets and accelerated (1g) targets. Probability ranged from 9 to 100%, and the time interval between consecutive repetitions of the same target ranged from about 1 to 20 min. We found that subjects systematically timed their responses consistent with the assumption of gravity effects, for both 1 and 0g trials. With training, subjects rapidly adapted to 0g targets by shifting the time of motor activation. Surprisingly, the adaptation rate was independent of both the probability of 0g targets and their temporal distance. Very few 0g trials sporadically interspersed as catch trials during immersive practice with 1g trials were sufficient for learning and consolidation in long-term memory, as verified by retesting after 24 h. We argue that the memory store for adapted states of the internal gravity model is triggered by individual events and can be sustained for prolonged periods of time separating sporadic repetitions. This form of event-related learning could depend on multiple-stage memory, with exponential rise and decay in the initial stages followed by a sample-and-hold module.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456796     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00833.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Barbara La Scaleia; William L Miller; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Use of visual information in the correction of interceptive actions.

Authors:  Luis A Teixeira; Romeo Chua; Paul Nagelkerke; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Why do patients with cerebellar ataxia not use environmental cues for reducing unpredictability of sudden gait stopping?

Authors:  M Iosa; G Morone; A Fusco; S Paolucci
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intercepting moving targets: does memory from practice in a specific condition of target displacement affect movement timing?

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.