Literature DB >> 21947172

Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Myrka Zago1, Barbara La Scaleia, William L Miller, Francesco Lacquaniti.   

Abstract

Vision of human actions can affect several features of visual motion processing, as well as the motor responses of the observer. Here, we tested the hypothesis that action observation helps decoding environmental forces during the interception of a decelerating target within a brief time window, a task intrinsically very difficult. We employed a factorial design to evaluate the effects of scene orientation (normal or inverted) and target gravity (normal or inverted). Button-press triggered the motion of a bullet, a piston, or a human arm. We found that the timing errors were smaller for upright scenes irrespective of gravity direction in the Bullet group, while the errors were smaller for the standard condition of normal scene and gravity in the Piston group. In the Arm group, instead, performance was better when the directions of scene and target gravity were concordant, irrespective of whether both were upright or inverted. These results suggest that the default viewer-centered reference frame is used with inanimate scenes, such as those of the Bullet and Piston protocols. Instead, the presence of biological movements in animate scenes (as in the Arm protocol) may help processing target kinematics under the ecological conditions of coherence between scene and target gravity directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947172     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2871-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

Review 1.  Simulation during observation of human actions--theories, empirical studies, applications.

Authors:  Karen Zentgraf; Jörn Munzert; Matthias Bischoff; Roger D Newman-Norlund
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion induction from biological motion.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Fujimoto
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The body-inversion effect.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Valerie E Stone; Senia Bozova; James Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

4.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Rolling perception without rolling motion.

Authors:  Songjoo Oh; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Manual interception of moving targets. I. Performance and movement initiation.

Authors:  N L Port; D Lee; P Dassonville; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Expertise, visual search, and information pick-up in squash.

Authors:  B Abernethy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  On interference effects in concurrent perception and action.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Marc Grosjean; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-13

10.  The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action.

Authors:  Roger D Newman-Norlund; Hein T van Schie; Alexander M J van Zuijlen; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  6 in total

1.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of speeding up or slowing down animate or inanimate motions on timing.

Authors:  Mauro Carrozzo; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Familiar trajectories facilitate the interpretation of physical forces when intercepting a moving target.

Authors:  Antonija Mijatović; Barbara La Scaleia; Nicola Mercuri; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Watching the Effects of Gravity. Vestibular Cortex and the Neural Representation of "Visual" Gravity.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Iole Indovina; Myrka Zago; Elena Daprati; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 5.  Visual gravitational motion and the vestibular system in humans.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 6.  How long did it last? You would better ask a human.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Mauro Carrozzo; Andrea d'Avella; Barbara La Scaleia; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.