Literature DB >> 15452695

[CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types].

M Lell1, K Anders, C Leidecker, W Lang, W Bautz, M Uder.   

Abstract

Noninvasive modalities like CTA are increasingly replacing selective angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Dedicated scan protocols and contrast injection techniques are mandatory for the morphological assessment of carotid artery stenosis. These protocols need to be adapted to different scanner types. The delineation of plaque components and the residual lumen is improved with high resolution scan protocols and dedicated reconstruction algorithms. The exact delineation of in-stent stenosis remains limited. Standardization of postprocessing is crucial in order to attain reproducible results. Multislice spiral CT allows reliable grading of carotid artery stenosis. Relevant venous opacification and pulsation artifacts have to be expected with 4-slice scanners, the short scan time of the latest CT scanners minimize these problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15452695     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-004-1106-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  27 in total

1.  Usefulness of CT angiography with volume rendering after carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  X Leclerc; J Y Gauvrit; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  CT angiographic measurement of the carotid artery: optimizing visualization by manipulating window and level settings and contrast material attenuation.

Authors:  Y Liu; K D Hopper; D T Mauger; K A Addis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district.

Authors:  Dominik Fleischmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Multi-Slice CT angiography in diagnosing total versus near occlusions of the internal carotid artery: comparison with catheter angiography.

Authors:  Chi-Jen Chen; Tsong-Hai Lee; Hui-Ling Hsu; Ying-Chi Tseng; Shinn-Kuang Lin; Li-Jen Wang; Yon-Cheong Wong
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.

Authors:  Paul J Nederkoorn; Otto E H Elgersma; Yolanda van der Graaf; Bert C Eikelboom; L Jaap Kappelle; Willem P T M Mali
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  O E Elgersma; P C Buijs; A F Wüst; Y van der Graaf; B C Eikelboom; W P Mali
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: assessment of interactive volume rendering.

Authors:  G Verhoek; P Costello; E W Khoo; R Wu; E Kat; R A Fitridge
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography.

Authors:  D Fleischmann; G D Rubin; A A Bankier; K Hittmair
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method.

Authors:  Zishu Zhang; Marja H Berg; Aki E J Ikonen; Ritva L Vanninen; Hannu I Manninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  [CT diagnostics of carotid artery stenosis].

Authors:  W Reith; C Roth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?

Authors:  J Weber; P Veith; B Jung; G Ihorst; O Moske-Eick; S Meckel; H Urbach; C A Taschner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  [Value of CT and MR angiography for diagnostics of intracranial aneurysms].

Authors:  C Roth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Cerebrovascular diagnostics: imaging].

Authors:  C Roth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.635

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.