PURPOSE: To evaluate a broad range of window and level settings for various contrast material attenuation coefficients and degrees of vascular stenosis to obtain the most accurate computed tomographic (CT) angiographic measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25, 480 measurements were made transversely (perpendicular to the lumen) and by means of maximum intensity projection (MIP) in a phantom with stenoses of 0%-100%, contrast material with attenuation coefficients of 150-350 HU, and 14 window and 13 level settings. Edge definition was also evaluated. RESULTS: There was an inherent relationship between the contrast material attenuation coefficient and the optimal window and level settings in the measurement of stenoses at both transverse and MIP CT angiography. This relationship between the contrast material attenuation coefficient D: and the optimal settings for window W: and level L: was represented by the following simple equations: W:/D: = [-2 x (L:/D:)] + 1.3, where -0.2 < L:/D: < 0.5, and W:/D: = [3.3 x (L:/D:)] - 1.3, where 0.5 < L:/D: < 1.0. With a vascular contrast material attenuation coefficient of 250-350 HU, the best transverse and MIP display settings for the window and level were 96 and 150 HU, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of optimized window and level settings at CT angiography reduces measurement variability.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a broad range of window and level settings for various contrast material attenuation coefficients and degrees of vascular stenosis to obtain the most accurate computed tomographic (CT) angiographic measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25, 480 measurements were made transversely (perpendicular to the lumen) and by means of maximum intensity projection (MIP) in a phantom with stenoses of 0%-100%, contrast material with attenuation coefficients of 150-350 HU, and 14 window and 13 level settings. Edge definition was also evaluated. RESULTS: There was an inherent relationship between the contrast material attenuation coefficient and the optimal window and level settings in the measurement of stenoses at both transverse and MIP CT angiography. This relationship between the contrast material attenuation coefficient D: and the optimal settings for window W: and level L: was represented by the following simple equations: W:/D: = [-2 x (L:/D:)] + 1.3, where -0.2 < L:/D: < 0.5, and W:/D: = [3.3 x (L:/D:)] - 1.3, where 0.5 < L:/D: < 1.0. With a vascular contrast material attenuation coefficient of 250-350 HU, the best transverse and MIP display settings for the window and level were 96 and 150 HU, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of optimized window and level settings at CT angiography reduces measurement variability.
Authors: Evert F S van Velsen; Wiro J Niessen; Thomas T de Weert; Cécile de Monyé; Aad van der Lugt; Erik Meijering; Rik Stokking Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Annet Waaijer; M Weber; M S van Leeuwen; J Kardux; W B Veldhuis; R Lo; F J A Beek; M Prokop Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-07-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Andreas M Bucher; Lukas Lenga; Christophe T Arendt; Julia L Peterke; Damiano Caruso; Silvio Mazziotti; Alfredo Blandino; Giorgio Ascenti; Ahmed E Othman; Simon S Martin; Doris Leithner; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 5.315