Literature DB >> 3780246

Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output.

K D Donovan, G J Dobb, W P Woods, B E Hockings.   

Abstract

Cardiac output was measured 120 times in 27 critically ill patients using the thermodilution and transthoracic electrical impedance methods. Both the minimum and mean values for the distance between the inner electrodes, and a variety of values for the resistivity of blood (rho) were substituted in the Kubicek's empiric formula for calculating cardiac output by transthoracic electrical impedance. Using the mean distance between the inner electrodes and a rho-value of 150 ohm X cm gave the best agreement between the methods (mean difference 0.17 +/- 2.4 L/min). Ventilation alone or with positive end-expiratory pressure did not significantly affect the bias of the estimate, but both affected its precision when compared with measurements in spontaneously breathing patients (SD of mean difference 2.4 and 3.2 L/min, respectively, vs. 1.5 L/min). The pulmonary artery wedge pressure was significantly higher in patients with an abnormal diastolic impedance waveform (zero-wave), but there was no relationship between wedge pressure and base impedance per unit length between the measuring electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3780246     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198612000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  14 in total

1.  Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; R C Cooper; M Ekwuru; S Fletcher; J Gilbody; T S Husseyin; M Ishaque; R Jagathesan; G Reddy; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Respiratory effects on cardiac related impedance indices measured under voluntary cardio-respiratory synchronisation (VCRS).

Authors:  L Wang; R P Patterson; S B Raza
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Mapping the cardiogenic impedance signal on the thoracic surface.

Authors:  R P Patterson; L Wang; B Raza; K Wood
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Optimalisation of the spot electrode array in impedance cardiography.

Authors:  H H Woltjer; B W Arntzen; H J Bogaard; P M de Vries
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  A comparative evaluation of electrical velocimetry and inert gas rebreathing for the non-invasive assessment of cardiac output.

Authors:  Frederik Trinkmann; Manuel Berger; Ursula Hoffmann; Martin Borggrefe; Jens J Kaden; Joachim Saur
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  New signal processing techniques for improved precision of noninvasive impedance cardiography.

Authors:  J H Nagel; L Y Shyu; S P Reddy; B E Hurwitz; P M McCabe; N Schneiderman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  R W Gotshall; V C Wood; D S Miles
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Transthoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution technique for cardiac output measurement during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Preiser; A Daper; J N Parquier; B Contempré; J L Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  G J Dobb; K D Donovan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The influence of weight on stroke volume determination by means of impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  H H Woltjer; H J Bogaard; H I van der Spoel; P M de Vries
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.