Literature DB >> 11251493

Cesarean section: a worldwide epidemic?

B L Flamm1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11251493     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Delivery by caesarean section. Increased numbers of caesareans do not match diagnoses of fetal distress.

Authors:  A Banerjee; J Hollinshead; E Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

2.  Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-25

3.  Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China.

Authors:  Guo Sufang; Sabu S Padmadas; Zhao Fengmin; James J Brown; R William Stones
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Maria A Quigley
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Maria A Quigley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.