Literature DB >> 15371143

The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.

Dave Holmes1, Suzanne L Kennedy, Amélie Perron.   

Abstract

Nurses in psychiatric settings have an important role to play in the application of seclusion, a measure that continues to be a frequently used intervention for the management of disturbing patient behaviours. Albeit a controversial measure, isolating patients remains a common institutional practice that has received widespread attention from a political, ethical, legal, and clinical standpoint. Although there is an abundance of scientific work on the subject, few studies have examined the experience of patients being confined. In order to improve the quality of nursing care surrounding this measure it appeared essential to obtain data on patients' perspectives, information deemed valuable in orienting nursing interventions. This qualitative study, guided by a phenomenological research design, aimed at describing and gaining a better understanding of patients with a severe and persistent psychiatric disorder who were placed in a seclusion room while hospitalized on a closed psychiatric unit. Using a semi-structured, non-directive interview format, a total of six patients participated in this study. Content analysis of participants' narratives yielded three main themes that appeared to be central to their experience of seclusion: their experience of seclusion on an emotional level, their perception of this intervention, and how they coped during their stay in the seclusion room. Major findings emerging from this nursing study centred on the following dimensions: patients' perceptions of seclusion as a punitive measure and a modality for social control and, the experience of seclusion serving as an intensification of already existing feelings of exclusion, rejection, abandonment, and isolation. In addition the findings also suggest that it is not seclusion per se that impacts on their negative perception and negative emotional experience but rather the lack of nurse-patient contact during the seclusion experience. Furthermore, whether patients coped by regressing, acting out, or taking on a more compliant stance, they appeared to be motivated by a need to connect with staff. This points to the importance of the relational aspects of nursing care when applying this restrictive measure. A need for modifying the institutional culture surrounding seclusion and transforming nursing practices are discussed as are future research endeavours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371143     DOI: 10.1080/01612840490472101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 0161-2840            Impact factor:   1.835


  11 in total

1.  Understanding Mental Health Service User Experiences of Restraint Through Debriefing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Ling; Kristin Cleverley; Athina Perivolaris
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  The methodical work approach and the reduction in the use of seclusion: how did it work?

Authors:  Christien E Boumans; Serge J W Walvoort; Jos I M Egger; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2015-03

3.  Listening to the Patient Perspective: Psychiatric Inpatients' Attitudes Towards Physical Restraint.

Authors:  Yaniv Spinzy; Saed Maree; Aviv Segev; Gadi Cohen-Rappaport
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2018-09

4.  Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilera-Serrano; Jose Guzman-Parra; Juan A Garcia-Sanchez; Berta Moreno-Küstner; Fermin Mayoral-Cleries
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.356

5.  A New Acute-At-Home Child and Adolescent Clinical Service: Evaluation of Impact.

Authors:  Noorani Khalfan; Carol Coventry; David Cawthorpe
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Consumers and Carer perspectives on poor practice and the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health settings: results from Australian focus groups.

Authors:  Lisa M Brophy; Catherine E Roper; Bridget E Hamilton; Juan José Tellez; Bernadette M McSherry
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2016-02-06

7.  Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Thibaut; Lindsay Helen Dewa; Sonny Christian Ramtale; Danielle D'Lima; Sheila Adam; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Stephanie Archer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.

Authors:  Jan Bergk; Erich Flammer; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients' perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Does experienced seclusion or restraint affect psychiatric patients' subjective quality of life at discharge?

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Pauli Puukka; Anneli Pitkänen; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2013-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.