Literature DB >> 26454726

Understanding Mental Health Service User Experiences of Restraint Through Debriefing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Sara Ling1, Kristin Cleverley2, Athina Perivolaris3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine debriefing data to understand experiences before, during, and after a restraint (seclusion, chemical, and physical) event from the perspective of inpatients at a large urban mental health and addiction hospital.
METHOD: Audits were conducted on a purposeful sample of inpatient charts containing post-restraint event inpatient debrief forms (n = 55). Qualitative data from the forms were analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Loss of autonomy and related anger, conflict with staff and other inpatients, and unmet needs were the most common factors precipitating restraint events. Inpatients often reported that increased communication with staff could have prevented restraint. Inpatients described having had various negative emotional states and responses during restraint events, including fear and rejection. Post-restraint, inpatients often desired to leave the unit for fresh air or to engage in leisure activities.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, our study is the first to use debriefing form data to explore mental health inpatients' experiences of restraint. Inpatients view restraint negatively and do not experience it as a therapeutic intervention. Debriefing, guided by a form, is useful for understanding the inpatient's experience of restraint, and should be used to re-establish the therapeutic relationship and to inform plans of care. In addition, individual and collective inpatient perspectives should inform alternatives to restraint.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26454726      PMCID: PMC4574714          DOI: 10.1177/070674371506000903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0706-7437            Impact factor:   4.356


  32 in total

1.  Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric treatment settings: regulation, case law, and risk management.

Authors:  Patricia R Recupero; Marilyn Price; Keelin A Garvey; Brian Daly; Sarah L Xavier
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Establishing sensory-based approaches in mental health inpatient care: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Angela Chalmers; Sophie Harrison; Kade Mollison; Noel Molloy; Kelly Gray
Journal:  Australas Psychiatry       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.369

3.  Moral margins concerning the use of coercion in psychiatry.

Authors:  Elleke G M Landeweer; Tineke A Abma; Guy A M Widdershoven
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  The scope for replacing seclusion with time out in acute inpatient psychiatry in England.

Authors:  Len Bowers; Jamie Ross; Henk Nijman; Eimear Muir-Cochrane; Eric Noorthoorn; Duncan Stewart
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Caring with comfort rooms. Reducing seclusion and restraint use in psychiatric facilities.

Authors:  Kathleen S Cummings; Sylvia A Grandfield; Craig M Coldwell
Journal:  J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.098

6.  Seclusion and restraint in psychiatry: patients' experiences and practical suggestions on how to improve practices and use alternatives.

Authors:  Raija Kontio; Grigori Joffe; Hanna Putkonen; Lauri Kuosmanen; Kimmo Hane; Matti Holi; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  Perspect Psychiatr Care       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.186

7.  Pilot study of a sensory room in an acute inpatient psychiatric unit.

Authors:  Theresa Novak; Justin Scanlan; Damien McCaul; Nathan MacDonald; Timothy Clarke
Journal:  Australas Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.369

8.  Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: findings from ten European countries.

Authors:  Jirí Raboch; Lucie Kalisová; Alexander Nawka; Eva Kitzlerová; Georgi Onchev; Anastasia Karastergiou; Lorenza Magliano; Algirdas Dembinskas; Andrzej Kiejna; Francisco Torres-Gonzales; Lars Kjellin; Stefan Priebe; Thomas W Kallert
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  The relationship between attitudes towards different containment measures and their usage in a national sample of psychiatric inpatients.

Authors:  C Dack; J Ross; L Bowers
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.952

10.  Patients' preference and experiences of forced medication and seclusion.

Authors:  Irina Georgieva; C L Mulder; A Wierdsma
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2012-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Valuable New Insights Into Access to Mental Health Care Services.

Authors:  Roger Bland
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilera-Serrano; Jose Guzman-Parra; Juan A Garcia-Sanchez; Berta Moreno-Küstner; Fermin Mayoral-Cleries
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 3.  [Post-seclusion/post-restraint debriefing with patients-overview and current situation].

Authors:  Eva Krieger; Rabea Fischer; Steffen Moritz; Matthias Nagel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Fear of relapse in schizophrenia: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Allan; Andrew Gumley; Zofia Zukowska; Emily Eisner; Li Ling
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of user-driven intervention to prevent aggressive events in psychiatric services.

Authors:  Maritta Välimäki; Min Yang; Sharon-Lise Normand; Kate R Lorig; Minna Anttila; Tella Lantta; Virve Pekurinen; Clive E Adams
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Post-incident reviews-a gift to the Ward or just another procedure? Care providers' experiences and considerations regarding post-incident reviews after restraint in mental health services. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Unn Elisabeth Hammervold; Reidun Norvoll; Kari Vevatne; Hildegunn Sagvaag
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  What does coercion in intensive care mean for patients and their relatives? A thematic qualitative study.

Authors:  Susanne Jöbges; Corine Mouton Dorey; Rouven Porz; Bara Ricou; Nicola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.