Literature DB >> 29441444

Listening to the Patient Perspective: Psychiatric Inpatients' Attitudes Towards Physical Restraint.

Yaniv Spinzy1,2, Saed Maree3, Aviv Segev3,4, Gadi Cohen-Rappaport4,5.   

Abstract

When other options fail, physical restraint is used in inpatient psychiatric units as a means to control violent behavior of agitated inpatients and to prevent them from harm. The professional and social discourse regarding the use of restrictive measures and the absence of the inpatients' attitudes towards these measures is notable. Our research therefore tries to fill this gap by interviewing inpatients about these issues. To assess the subjective experience and attitudes of inpatients who have undergone physical restraint. Forty inpatients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders were interviewed by way of a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were conducted via use of SPSS statistical software. 1.Inpatients reported that physical restraint evoked an experience of loneliness (77.5%) and loss of autonomy (82.5%). 2.Staff visits during times of physical restraint were reported as beneficial according to 73.6% of the inpatients interviewed. 3.Two thirds of the inpatients viewed the use of physical restraints as justified when an inpatient was dangerous. 4.Two thirds of the inpatients regarded physical restraint as the most aversive experience of their hospitalization. Our pilot study explored the subjective experience and attitudes of psychiatric inpatients towards the use of physical restraint. Inpatients viewed physical restraint as a practice that was sometimes justified but at the same time evoked negative subjective feelings. We conclude that listening to inpatients' perspectives can help caregivers to evaluate these measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed door unit; Patient perspective; Physical restraint; Psychosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29441444     DOI: 10.1007/s11126-018-9565-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  15 in total

Review 1.  Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  E Sailas; M Fenton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

2.  Physical restraints versus seclusion room for management of people with acute aggression or agitation due to psychotic illness (TREC-SAVE): a randomized trial.

Authors:  G Huf; E S F Coutinho; C E Adams
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 3.  Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Brenda Happell; Alison Harrow
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.503

Review 4.  The current state of psychiatry in the treatment of violent patients.

Authors:  K Tardiff
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-06

Review 5.  Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature.

Authors:  W A Fisher
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Patients' perceptions of seclusion: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  T Meehan; C Vermeer; C Windsor
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Violence and aggression in psychiatric units.

Authors:  C Owen; C Tarantello; M Jones; C Tennant
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects.

Authors:  B B Way; S M Banks
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1990-01

9.  The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Dave Holmes; Suzanne L Kennedy; Amélie Perron
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.835

Review 10.  On the seclusion of psychiatric patients.

Authors:  J S Brown; S K Tooke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.