Literature DB >> 15348819

Surface activation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and formation of calcium phosphate coatings by precipitation.

S W Ha1, M Kirch, F Birchler, K L Eckert, J Mayer, E Wintermantel, C Sittig, I Pfund-Klingenfuss, M Textor, N D Spencer, M Guecheva, H Vonmont.   

Abstract

Plasma activation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces and the influence on coating formation in a supersaturated calcium phosphate solution was investigated in this study. It was observed that plasma treatment in a N2/O2 plasma had a significant effect on the wettability of the PEEK surface. The contact angle decreased from 85 degrees to 25 degrees after plasma treatment. Cell culture testing with osteoblastic cell lines showed plasma activation not to be disadvantageous to cell viability. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed to characterize the chemical composition of the PEEK surfaces. It was observed that the O1s intensity increased with plasma activation time. At the C1s peak the appearance of a shoulder at higher binding energies was observed. Coating of PEEK was performed in a supersaturated calcium phosphate solution. Coating thicknesses of up to 50 microm were achieved after 24 days of immersion. Plasma activation followed by nucleation in a highly saturated hydroxyapatite solution had a positive effect on the growth rate of the layer on PEEK. Chemical analysis revealed that the coating consists of a carbonate-containing calcium phosphate.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 15348819     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018535923173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  8 in total

1.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The influence of different degrees of stiffness of fixation plates on experimental bone healing.

Authors:  T Terjesen; K Apalset
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Screening of matrices and fibers for reinforced thermoplastics intended for dental applications.

Authors:  A J Goldberg; C J Burstone; I Hadjinikolaou; J Jancar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1994-02

4.  The effect of calcium phosphate ceramic composition and structure on in vitro behavior. I. Dissolution.

Authors:  P Ducheyne; S Radin; L King
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-01

5.  Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip prostheses. Two-year clinical and roentgenographic results of 100 cases.

Authors:  R G Geesink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biological response to chopped-carbon-fiber-reinforced peek.

Authors:  K A Jockisch; S A Brown; T W Bauer; K Merritt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1992-02

7.  Formation of carbonate-apatite crystals after implantation of calcium phosphate ceramics.

Authors:  G Daculsi; R Z LeGeros; M Heughebaert; I Barbieux
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Long-term histological evaluation of hydroxyapatite ceramics in humans.

Authors:  H Oguchi; K Ishikawa; K Mizoue; K Seto; G Eguchi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.479

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Apatite-forming PEEK with TiO2 surface layer coating.

Authors:  Takashi Kizuki; Tomiharu Matsushita; Tadashi Kokubo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; Nathan T Evans; Hazel Y Stevens; Ken Gall; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Nathan T Evans; F Brennan Torstrick; Christopher S D Lee; Kenneth M Dupont; David L Safranski; W Allen Chang; Annie E Macedo; Angela S P Lin; Jennifer M Boothby; Daniel C Whittingslow; Robert A Carson; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Evolution of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium interbody devices for spinal procedures: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Nallammai Muthiah; Yagiz Ugur Yolcu; Nima Alan; Nitin Agarwal; David Kojo Hamilton; Alp Ozpinar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK.

Authors:  Sina Heimer; Patrick R Schmidlin; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The influence of target stoichiometry on early cell adhesion of co-sputtered calcium-phosphate surfaces.

Authors:  A R Boyd; C O'Kane; P O'Hare; G A Burke; B J Meenan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 7.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Assessment of a polyelectrolyte multilayer film coating loaded with BMP-2 on titanium and PEEK implants in the rabbit femoral condyle.

Authors:  R Guillot; I Pignot-Paintrand; J Lavaud; A Decambron; E Bourgeois; V Josserand; D Logeart-Avramoglou; E Viguier; C Picart
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  In Vivo Osseointegration Performance of Titanium Dioxide Coating Modified Polyetheretherketone Using Arc Ion Plating for Spinal Implant Application.

Authors:  Hsi-Kai Tsou; Meng-Hui Chi; Yi-Wen Hung; Chi-Jen Chung; Ju-Liang He
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.