Literature DB >> 3370887

The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty.

C A Engh1, J D Bobyn.   

Abstract

The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption was examined in 411 cases of primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Moore design, cobalt alloy femoral implants with powder-made sintered porous coating on either one-third, two-thirds, or the full implant length were compared radiographically two years after surgery. A semiquantitative method was adopted for assessing resorption that involved dividing the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral roentgenograms into a total of 16 discrete sites. The 16 sites were qualitatively examined for evidence of resorption by either thinning or darkening of bone relative to the time immediately following surgery. Based on the number of sites that demonstrated resorption, the bone loss was classified as either minor and not likely to cause problems (0 to 4 sites) or pronounced and of potentially harmful clinical consequence (5 or more sites). Pronounced resorption occurred in 18% of the 411 cases. The use of larger stems resulted in increased occurrence of marked bone resorption: stems greater than or equal to 13.5 mm in diameter showed five times the incidence of pronounced resorption compared with stems less than or equal to 12.0 mm in diameter. Stems with two-thirds and full porous coating resulted in a twofold to fourfold increase in the incidence of pronounced bone resorption. The theoretic degree of stress shielding of the femoral shaft in bending was calculated for cases with complete canal filling and a radiographic appearance of bone ingrowth. There was a strong correlation between this theoretic factor and the observed bone resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3370887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  70 in total

1.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

3.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems.

Authors:  Keiji Sano; Kouji Ito; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Shaft lengthening in hip replacement: experimental studies on bending stiffness].

Authors:  K Burkhart; D Mehler; J Degreif; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Fifteen- to 20-year results of uncemented tapered fully porous-coated cobalt-chrome stems.

Authors:  Taek Rim Yoon; Sung-Man Rowe; Myung-Sun Kim; Sang-Gwon Cho; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Radiographic evaluation of bone adaptation adjacent to percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses in a sheep model.

Authors:  Sujee Jeyapalina; James Peter Beck; Kent N Bachus; Ornusa Chalayon; Roy D Bloebaum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Bone remodeling and hydroxyapatite resorption in coated primary hip prostheses.

Authors:  Alphons J Tonino; Bart C H van der Wal; Ide C Heyligers; Bernd Grimm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.