Literature DB >> 15347582

A statistical thermodynamic model applied to experimental AFM population and location data is able to quantify DNA-histone binding strength and internucleosomal interaction differences between acetylated and unacetylated nucleosomal arrays.

F J Solis1, R Bash, J Yodh, S M Lindsay, D Lohr.   

Abstract

Imaging of nucleosomal arrays by atomic force microscopy allows a determination of the exact statistical distributions for the numbers of nucleosomes per array and the locations of nucleosomes on the arrays. This precision makes such data an excellent reference for testing models of nucleosome occupation on multisite DNA templates. The approach presented here uses a simple statistical thermodynamic model to calculate theoretical population and positional distributions and compares them to experimental distributions previously determined for 5S rDNA nucleosomal arrays (208-12,172-12). The model considers the possible locations of nucleosomes on the template, and takes as principal parameters an average free energy of interaction between histone octamers and DNA, and an average wrapping length of DNA around the octamers. Analysis of positional statistics shows that it is possible to consider interactions between nucleosomes and positioning effects as perturbations on a random positioning noninteracting model. Analysis of the population statistics is used to determine histone-DNA association constants and to test for differences in the free energies of nucleosome formation with different types of histone octamers, namely acetylated or unacetylated, and different DNA templates, namely 172-12 or 208-12 5S rDNA multisite templates. The results show that the two template DNAs bind histones with similar affinities but histone acetylation weakens the association of histones with both templates. Analysis of locational statistics is used to determine the strength of specific nucleosome positioning tendencies by the DNA templates, and the strength of the interactions between neighboring nucleosomes. The results show only weak positioning tendencies and that unacetylated nucleosomes interact much more strongly with one another than acetylated nucleosomes; in fact acetylation appears to induce a small anticooperative occupation effect between neighboring nucleosomes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15347582      PMCID: PMC1304804          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.034744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  38 in total

Review 1.  The nucleosome core particle: does it have structural and physiologic relevance?

Authors:  K van Holde; J Zlatanova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Evidence for nonrandom behavior in 208-12 subsaturated nucleosomal array populations analyzed by AFM.

Authors:  J G Yodh; Y L Lyubchenko; L S Shlyakhtenko; N Woodbury; D Lohr
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Role of histone acetylation in the assembly and modulation of chromatin structures.

Authors:  A T Annunziato; J C Hansen
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2000

4.  Energetics and affinity of the histone octamer for defined DNA sequences.

Authors:  J M Gottesfeld; K Luger
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Mapping nucleosome locations on the 208-12 by AFM provides clear evidence for cooperativity in array occupation.

Authors:  Jaya G Yodh; Neal Woodbury; Luda S Shlyakhtenko; Yuri L Lyubchenko; D Lohr
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Conformational dynamics of the chromatin fiber in solution: determinants, mechanisms, and functions.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hansen
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001-10-25

7.  Mechanical disruption of individual nucleosomes reveals a reversible multistage release of DNA.

Authors:  Brent D Brower-Toland; Corey L Smith; Richard C Yeh; John T Lis; Craig L Peterson; Michelle D Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Population analysis of subsaturated 172-12 nucleosomal arrays by atomic force microscopy detects nonrandom behavior that is favored by histone acetylation and short repeat length.

Authors:  R C Bash; J Yodh; Y Lyubchenko; N Woodbury; D Lohr
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Polymer reptation and nucleosome repositioning.

Authors:  H Schiessel; J Widom; R F Bruinsma; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 9.161

10.  Salt-induced DNA-histone complexation.

Authors:  K K Kunze; R R Netz
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-11-13       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Organization of interphase chromatin.

Authors:  Rachel A Horowitz-Scherer; Christopher L Woodcock
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Using atomic force microscopy to study chromatin structure and nucleosome remodeling.

Authors:  D Lohr; R Bash; H Wang; J Yodh; S Lindsay
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals a highly compliant helical folding for the 30-nm chromatin fiber.

Authors:  Maarten Kruithof; Fan-Tso Chien; Andrew Routh; Colin Logie; Daniela Rhodes; John van Noort
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  The effect of internucleosomal interaction on folding of the chromatin fiber.

Authors:  René Stehr; Nick Kepper; Karsten Rippe; Gero Wedemann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A study of the distribution and density of the VEGFR-2 receptor on glioma microvascular endothelial cell membranes.

Authors:  Dexiang Zhou; Shengquan Zhan; Dong Zhou; Zhaojie Li; Xiaofeng Lin; Kai Tang; Hang Shu; Guangzhong Chen; Shaojian Zeng; Yingqian Cai; Xiaodan Jiang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Epigenomics of Pancreatic Cancer: A Critical Role for Epigenome-Wide Studies.

Authors:  Rahul R Singh; Katie M Reindl; Rick J Jansen
Journal:  Epigenomes       Date:  2019-01-19

7.  Predicting nucleosome positions on the DNA: combining intrinsic sequence preferences and remodeler activities.

Authors:  Vladimir B Teif; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Determination of protein-DNA binding constants and specificities from statistical analyses of single molecules: MutS-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Lauryn E Sass; Chunwei Du; Peggy Hsieh; Dorothy A Erie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.