Literature DB >> 11583994

Population analysis of subsaturated 172-12 nucleosomal arrays by atomic force microscopy detects nonrandom behavior that is favored by histone acetylation and short repeat length.

R C Bash1, J Yodh, Y Lyubchenko, N Woodbury, D Lohr.   

Abstract

Concatameric 5 S rDNA templates reconstituted in vitro into nucleosomal arrays provide very popular chromatin models for many kinds of studies. Here, atomic force microscopy is used to determine the population distributions for one such nucleosomal array, the 172-12, reconstituted to various subsaturated levels with nonacetylated or hyperacetylated HeLa histones. This array is a model for short linker length genomes and transcriptionally active and newly replicated chromatins. The analysis shows that as input histone levels increase, template occupation increases progressively as discrete population distributions. The distributions are random at low (n(av) < 4) and high (n(av) > 8) loadings but display specific nonrandom features, such as a deficit of molecules with one nucleosome more or less than the peak species in the distribution and enhanced distribution breadths, in the mid-range (n(av) = 4-8). Thus, the mid-range of occupation on polynucleosomal arrays may be a special range for chromatin structure and/or assembly. The mid-range nonrandom features are enhanced in distributions from short repeat (172-12) arrays, particularly for unacetylated chromatin, and in distributions from hyperacetylated chromatin, particularly for long repeat (208-12) arrays. Thus, short repeat length and acetylation can affect basic chromatin properties, like population tendencies, in very similar ways and therefore may cause similar changes in chromatin structure. Some possible effects are suggested. The data also indicate that it is thermodynamically more difficult for hyperacetylated nucleosomes to assemble onto the 172-12 templates, a result having implications for in vivo chromatin assembly.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11583994     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M104916200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  8 in total

1.  A statistical thermodynamic model applied to experimental AFM population and location data is able to quantify DNA-histone binding strength and internucleosomal interaction differences between acetylated and unacetylated nucleosomal arrays.

Authors:  F J Solis; R Bash; J Yodh; S M Lindsay; D Lohr
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Using atomic force microscopy to study chromatin structure and nucleosome remodeling.

Authors:  D Lohr; R Bash; H Wang; J Yodh; S Lindsay
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Two-component atomic force microscopy recognition imaging of complex samples.

Authors:  H Wang; R Bash; D Lohr
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Glutaraldehyde modified mica: a new surface for atomic force microscopy of chromatin.

Authors:  Hongda Wang; Ralph Bash; Jiya G Yodh; Gordon L Hager; D Lohr; Stuart M Lindsay
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Sequence-dependent variations associated with H2A/H2B depletion of nucleosomes.

Authors:  L Kelbauskas; N Chan; R Bash; P DeBartolo; J Sun; N Woodbury; D Lohr
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Conformation of reconstituted mononucleosomes and effect of linker histone H1 binding studied by scanning force microscopy.

Authors:  Jochen Felix Kepert; Katalin Fejes Tóth; Maïwen Caudron; Norbert Mücke; Jörg Langowski; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Hydrophobicity of methylated DNA as a possible mechanism for gene silencing.

Authors:  Parminder Kaur; Birgit Plochberger; Peter Costa; Stephanie M Cope; Sara M Vaiana; Stuart Lindsay
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Atomic force microscopy of chromatin arrays reveal non-monotonic salt dependence of array compaction in solution.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Krzemien; Maximilian Beckers; Salina Quack; Jens Michaelis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.