Literature DB >> 15340767

Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

D Yoganarasimha1, James J Knierim.   

Abstract

Hippocampal place cells are selectively active when a rat occupies restricted locations in an environment, and head direction cells fire selectively when the rat's head is pointed in a particular direction in allocentric space. Both place cells and head direction cells are usually coupled, and they are controlled by a complex interaction between external landmarks and idiothetic cues. Most studies have investigated this interaction by rotating the landmarks in the environment. In contrast, a recent study translated the apparatus relative to the landmarks in an environment and found that most place cells maintained the same preferred location on the apparatus regardless of the location of the apparatus in the room. Because head direction cells are insensitive to the rat's location in an environment, the distal landmarks may influence the place field firing locations primarily by controlling the bearing of the head direction cell system. To address this question, ensembles of CA1 place cells and head direction cells of the anterior thalamus were recorded simultaneously, as a rectangular or circular track was moved to different locations in a room with distinct visual landmarks. Most place cells maintained their firing fields relative to the track when the track was translated, and head direction cells maintained the same preferred firing direction. When the distal landmarks were rotated around the track, the firing fields of place cells and the preferred directions of head direction cells rotated with the cues. These results suggest that the precise firing locations of place cells are controlled by an interaction between local and idiothetic cues, and the orientation of the CA1 ensemble representation relative to the distal landmarks may be controlled indirectly by the distal landmarks' influence over the bearing of the head direction cell system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15340767     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  Further study of the control of place cell firing by intra-apparatus objects.

Authors:  A Cressant; R U Muller; B Poucet
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Dynamic filtering of recognition memory codes in the hippocampus.

Authors:  S P Wiebe; U V Stäubli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Background, but not foreground, spatial cues are taken as references for head direction responses by rat anterodorsal thalamus neurons.

Authors:  M B Zugaro; A Berthoz; S I Wiener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dorsal striatal head direction and hippocampal place representations during spatial navigation.

Authors:  K E Ragozzino; S Leutgeb; S J Mizumori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Correlates of hippocampal complex-spike cell activity in rats performing a nonspatial radial maze task.

Authors:  B J Young; G D Fox; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Learned interaction of visual and idiothetic cues in the control of place field orientation.

Authors:  K J Jeffery; J M O'Keefe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  E J Markus; Y L Qin; B Leonard; W E Skaggs; B L McNaughton; C A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation.

Authors:  J S Taube; H L Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  14 in total

1.  Backward shift of head direction tuning curves of the anterior thalamus: comparison with CA1 place fields.

Authors:  Xintian Yu; D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Head direction cell representations maintain internal coherence during conflicting proximal and distal cue rotations: comparison with hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; Xintian Yu; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dominance of the proximal coordinate frame in determining the locations of hippocampal place cell activity during navigation.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Joshua P Neunuebel; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Membrane potential dynamics underlying context-dependent sensory responses in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhao; Yingxue Wang; Nelson Spruston; Jeffrey C Magee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Physiological Properties and Behavioral Correlates of Hippocampal Granule Cells and Mossy Cells.

Authors:  Yuta Senzai; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Theta-modulated head direction cells in the rat anterior thalamus.

Authors:  Marian Tsanov; Ehsan Chah; Seralynne D Vann; Richard B Reilly; Jonathan T Erichsen; John P Aggleton; Shane M O'Mara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  How the Internally Organized Direction Sense Is Used to Navigate.

Authors:  Eun Hye Park; Stephen Keeley; Cristina Savin; James B Ranck; André A Fenton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Head direction cell activity in mice: robust directional signal depends on intact otolith organs.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Odor supported place cell model and goal navigation in rodents.

Authors:  Tomas Kulvicius; Minija Tamosiunaite; James Ainge; Paul Dudchenko; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 1.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.