Literature DB >> 10495023

Further study of the control of place cell firing by intra-apparatus objects.

A Cressant1, R U Muller, B Poucet.   

Abstract

The angular positions of hippocampal place cell firing fields are accurately controlled by the position of a single salient cue card attached to the wall of a recording cylinder; when the card is rotated, fields rotate equally. In contrast, the control exerted by 3-dimensional objects placed directly in the recording arena depends on their arrangement. When three objects lie on the vertices of an isosceles triangle near the center of the cylinder they rarely exert any control over the angular positions of firing fields. However, if the isosceles triangle is dilated so that its vertices are against the apparatus wall, the objects exert virtually ideal control over angular field position. Why do the objects gain control when they are against the cylinder wall? One possibility is that the asymmetry in the object set is more easily detected when the objects are far apart so that they provide a better polarizing cue. This hypothesis assumes that the identity of individual landmarks is not recognized by the place cell system whereas their geometric arrangement provides crucial information for controlling place field positions. If this is true, putting the 3 objects against the cylinder wall on the vertices of an equilateral triangle should cause a loss of stimulus control over the angular positions of firing fields. To the contrary, we found that the firing fields of most place cells (23/29) were accurately controlled by the equilateral object arrangement. Moreover, 5/6 of the uncontrolled cells were in a single animal. These results bolster our previous suggestion that the centrally placed objects fail to control place field positions because the computations necessary to form a stable reference frame are very difficult when the animal can go between stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495023     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:4<423::AID-HIPO8>3.0.CO;2-U

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  13 in total

1.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 3.  Framing the grid: effect of boundaries on grid cells and navigation.

Authors:  Julija Krupic; Marius Bauza; Stephen Burton; John O'Keefe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The influence of objects on place field expression and size in distal hippocampal CA1.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Andrew P Maurer; Saman Nematollahi; Ajay R Uprety; Jenelle L Wallace; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Objects and landmarks: hippocampal place cells respond differently to manipulations of visual cues depending on size, perspective, and experience.

Authors:  Kristin M Scaplen; Arune A Gulati; Victoria L Heimer-McGinn; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  The rodent hippocampus is essential for nonspatial object memory.

Authors:  Sarah J Cohen; Alcira H Munchow; Lisa M Rios; Gongliang Zhang; Herborg N Asgeirsdóttir; Robert W Stackman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Influence of local objects on hippocampal representations: Landmark vectors and memory.

Authors:  Sachin S Deshmukh; James J Knierim
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Differences in hippocampal neuronal population responses to modifications of an environmental context: evidence for distinct, yet complementary, functions of CA3 and CA1 ensembles.

Authors:  Almira Vazdarjanova; John F Guzowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The neural representation of 3-dimensional objects in rodent memory circuits.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The stimulus control of local enclosures and barriers over head direction and place cell spatial firing.

Authors:  Anna E Smith; Emma R Wood; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.