Literature DB >> 17959742

Dominance of the proximal coordinate frame in determining the locations of hippocampal place cell activity during navigation.

Jennifer J Siegel1, Joshua P Neunuebel, James J Knierim.   

Abstract

The place-specific activity of hippocampal cells provides downstream structures with information regarding an animal's position within an environment and, perhaps, the location of goals within that environment. In rodents, recent research has suggested that distal cues primarily set the orientation of the spatial representation, whereas the boundaries of the behavioral apparatus determine the locations of place activity. The current study was designed to address possible biases in some previous research that may have minimized the likelihood of observing place activity bound to distal cues. Hippocampal single-unit activity was recorded from six freely moving rats as they were trained to perform a tone-initiated place-preference task on an open-field platform. To investigate whether place activity was bound to the room- or platform-based coordinate frame (or both), the platform was translated within the room at an "early" and at a "late" phase of task acquisition (Shift 1 and Shift 2). At both time points, CA1 and CA3 place cells demonstrated room-associated and/or platform-associated activity, or remapped in response to the platform shift. Shift 1 revealed place activity that reflected an interaction between a dominant platform-based (proximal) coordinate frame and a weaker room-based (distal) frame because many CA1 and CA3 place fields shifted to a location intermediate to the two reference frames. Shift 2 resulted in place activity that became more strongly bound to either the platform- or room-based coordinate frame, suggesting the emergence of two independent spatial frames of reference (with many more cells participating in platform-based than in room-based representations).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17959742      PMCID: PMC2268613          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00731.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  55 in total

1.  Background, but not foreground, spatial cues are taken as references for head direction responses by rat anterodorsal thalamus neurons.

Authors:  M B Zugaro; A Berthoz; S I Wiener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Hippocampal-parietal cortical interactions in spatial cognition.

Authors:  E Save; B Poucet
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Learning-related development of context-specific neuronal responses to places and events: the hippocampal role in context processing.

Authors:  David M Smith; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Correlates of hippocampal complex-spike cell activity in rats performing a nonspatial radial maze task.

Authors:  B J Young; G D Fox; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Learned interaction of visual and idiothetic cues in the control of place field orientation.

Authors:  K J Jeffery; J M O'Keefe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sequential-context-dependent hippocampal activity is not necessary to learn sequences with repeated elements.

Authors:  Mark R Bower; David R Euston; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Goal-related activity in hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  Vincent Hok; Pierre-Pascal Lenck-Santini; Sébastien Roux; Etienne Save; Robert U Muller; Bruno Poucet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  E J Markus; Y L Qin; B Leonard; W E Skaggs; B L McNaughton; C A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Representation of objects in space by two classes of hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Bruno Rivard; Yu Li; Pierre-Pascal Lenck-Santini; Bruno Poucet; Robert U Muller
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  18 in total

1.  Persistent activity in a cortical-to-subcortical circuit: bridging the temporal gap in trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Brian Kalmbach; Raymond A Chitwood; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Framing of grid cells within and beyond navigation boundaries.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; J D Luck; James J Knierim
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Persistent activity in prefrontal cortex during trace eyelid conditioning: dissociating responses that reflect cerebellar output from those that do not.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Modification of persistent responses in medial prefrontal cortex during learning in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Decreases Spatial Information Content and Reduces Place Field Stability of Hippocampal CA1 Neurons.

Authors:  John I Broussard; John B Redell; Jing Zhao; Mark E Maynard; Nobuhide Kobori; Alec Perez; Kimberly N Hood; Xu O Zhang; Anthony N Moore; Pramod K Dash
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 7.  Theoretical accounts of spatial learning: a neurobiological view (commentary on Pearce, 2009).

Authors:  Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Dynamic grouping of hippocampal neural activity during cognitive control of two spatial frames.

Authors:  Eduard Kelemen; André A Fenton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Conflicts between local and global spatial frameworks dissociate neural representations of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Joshua P Neunuebel; D Yoganarasimha; Geeta Rao; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Linear Self-Motion Cues Support the Spatial Distribution and Stability of Hippocampal Place Cells.

Authors:  Ryan E Harvey; Stephanie A Rutan; Gabrielle R Willey; Jennifer J Siegel; Benjamin J Clark; Ryan M Yoder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.