Literature DB >> 7965059

Correlates of hippocampal complex-spike cell activity in rats performing a nonspatial radial maze task.

B J Young1, G D Fox, H Eichenbaum.   

Abstract

The observation of hippocampal place cells forms a major line of evidence supporting the view that the hippocampus is dedicated to spatial processing. However, most studies demonstrating the spatial properties of hippocampal unit activity have employed tasks that emphasize spatial cues but minimize nonspatial cues. In the present experiment we recorded the activity of hippocampal complex-spike cells from rats performing a nonspatial radial maze task. Performance in this task was guided by local visual-tactile cues on the maze arms, while distal spatial cues were minimized and made irrelevant. The influence of three variables on unit activity was examined:type of cue on an arm, spatial location of an arm, and the relative position of the animal on an arm. Of the units recorded, almost one-fifth were classified as "cue cells" in that their activity was associated with cue type but not spatial location. Conversely, a similar proportion of the units were classified as "place cells" in that their activity was associated with location, but not cue type. In an additional similar proportion of units, firing was influenced only by relative position and not by local cues or spatial locations. For the majority of units, however, firing was related to combinations of these three variables, indicating that most hippocampal neurons encoded conjunctions or relations between spatial and local cue information. This pattern of results indicates that when local rather than distal spatial cues are emphasized, hippocampal neural activity is strongly influenced by salient nonspatial cues and shows no overwhelming predominance of place coding. These findings are at odds with the hypothesis that the hippocampus is selectively involved in spatial processing and, conversely, support the broader view that the hippocampus encodes both spatial and nonspatial relations among important experimental variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965059      PMCID: PMC6577229     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  35 in total

1.  Accumulation of hippocampal place fields at the goal location in an annular watermaze task.

Authors:  S A Hollup; S Molden; J G Donnett; M B Moser; E I Moser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Common firing patterns of hippocampal cells in a differential reinforcement of low rates of response schedule.

Authors:  B Young; N McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial representation along the proximodistal axis of CA1.

Authors:  Espen J Henriksen; Laura L Colgin; Carol A Barnes; Menno P Witter; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Head direction cell representations maintain internal coherence during conflicting proximal and distal cue rotations: comparison with hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; Xintian Yu; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Experience-dependent gene expression in the rat hippocampus after spatial learning: a comparison of the immediate-early genes Arc, c-fos, and zif268.

Authors:  J F Guzowski; B Setlow; E K Wagner; J L McGaugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dominance of the proximal coordinate frame in determining the locations of hippocampal place cell activity during navigation.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Joshua P Neunuebel; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Striatal versus hippocampal representations during win-stay maze performance.

Authors:  Joshua D Berke; Jason T Breck; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Impaired hippocampal rate coding after lesions of the lateral entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Li Lu; Jill K Leutgeb; Albert Tsao; Espen J Henriksen; Stefan Leutgeb; Carol A Barnes; Menno P Witter; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.