Literature DB >> 15336935

Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies.

Marco Viceconti1, Mario Davinelli, Fulvia Taddei, Angelo Cappello.   

Abstract

Most of the finite element models of bones used in orthopaedic biomechanics research are based on generic anatomies. However, in many cases it would be useful to generate from CT data a separate finite element model for each subject of a study group. In a recent study a hexahedral mesh generator based on a grid projection algorithm was found very effective in terms of accuracy and automation. However, so far the use of this method has been documented only on data collected in vitro and only for long bones. The present study was aimed at verifying if this method represents a procedure for the generation of finite element models of human bones from data collected in vivo, robust, accurate, automatic and general enough to be used in clinical studies. Robustness, automation and numerical accuracy of the proposed method were assessed on five femoral CT data sets of patients affected by various pathologies. The generality of the method was verified by processing a femur, an ileum, a phalanx, a proximal femur reconstruction, and the micro-CT of a small sample of spongy bone. The method was found robust enough to cope with the variability of the five femurs, producing meshes with a numerical accuracy and a computational weight comparable to those found in vitro. Even when the method was used to process the other bones the levels of mesh conditioning remained within acceptable limits. Thus, it may be concluded that the method presents a generality sufficient to cope with almost any orthopaedic application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15336935     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  17 in total

1.  Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.

Authors:  Kıvanç Akça; Atılım Eser; Yeliz Çavuşoğlu; Elçin Sağırkaya; Murat Cavit Çehreli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Alexander Cong; Jorn Op Den Buijs; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Retroacetabular stress-shielding in THA.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Akanksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Predicting distal femur bone strength in a murine model of tumor osteolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; John Lee; Sarah A Arrington; Timothy A Damron; Matthew J Allen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical ct data for hip fracture prediction.

Authors:  Yves Pauchard; Thomas Fitze; Diego Browarnik; Amiraslan Eskandari; Irene Pauchard; William Enns-Bray; Halldór Pálsson; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Stephen J Ferguson; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Benedikt Helgason
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  [Applications of numerical simulation in musculoskeletal research and its impact on orthopedic surgery].

Authors:  D Kluess; C Hurschler; C Voigt; A Hölzer; M Stoffel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  A network modeling approach for the spatial distribution and structure of bone mineral content.

Authors:  Hui Li; Aidong Zhang; Lawrence Bone; Cathy Buyea; Murali Ramanathan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Validation of computational models in biomechanics.

Authors:  H B Henninger; S P Reese; A E Anderson; J A Weiss
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  Morphing methods to parameterize specimen-specific finite element model geometries.

Authors:  Ian A Sigal; Hongli Yang; Michael D Roberts; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.