Literature DB >> 15334580

Flow-gated phase-contrast MRI using radial acquisitions.

Richard B Thompson1, Elliot R McVeigh.   

Abstract

Phase-contrast (PC) MRI is a noninvasive method for imaging blood and tissue velocity. PC experiments are typically segmented into many cardiac cycles in order to obtain sufficient spatial and temporal resolution, and thus require a gating signal to properly combine the data from multiple cardiac cycles. Although the surface electrode ECG is the gating waveform of choice for cardiovascular MRI, alternative gating methods are required for fetal cardiac imaging (due to the unavailability of fetal ECG signals) and for cases of ECG contamination via the strong magnetic fields within the MR scanner. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using imaging data from flow-encoded MRI experiments to derive times for cardiac gating. An undersampled radial k-space acquisition method is used to measure an image-derived flow-gating waveform in real-time, from which the gating times are derived. These gating times are used to reconstruct a conventional gated-segmented image series by combining the real-time data from multiple heartbeats. Flow-gated PC experiments were performed on five normal volunteers with slice prescriptions in four anatomic regions. The standard deviation (SD) of the difference between the flow-gating and ECG gating times ranged from 5 ms to 12 ms. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15334580      PMCID: PMC2396301          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  11 in total

1.  Phase-contrast with interleaved undersampled projections.

Authors:  A V Barger; D C Peters; W F Block; K K Vigen; F R Korosec; T M Grist; C A Mistretta
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography.

Authors:  D C Peters; F R Korosec; T M Grist; W F Block; J E Holden; K K Vigen; C A Mistretta
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Real-time volumetric flow measurements with complex-difference MRI.

Authors:  Richard B Thompson; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Comparison of phase-difference and complex-difference processing in phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; Y Ikezaki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N J Pelc; R J Herfkens; A Shimakawa; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1991-10

6.  Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow.

Authors:  N J Pelc; M A Bernstein; A Shimakawa; G H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence.

Authors:  D J Atkinson; R R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility.

Authors:  S J Riederer; T Tasciyan; F Farzaneh; J N Lee; R C Wright; R J Herfkens
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance.

Authors:  G L Nayler; D N Firmin; D B Longmore
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  A complex-difference phase-contrast technique for measurement of volume flow rates.

Authors:  J A Polzin; M T Alley; F R Korosec; T M Grist; Y Wang; C A Mistretta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  10 in total

1.  Validation of V-SS-PARSE for single-shot flow measurement.

Authors:  Jin Zuo; Mark Bolding; Donald B Twieg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Modeling systemic and renal gadolinium chelate transport with MRI.

Authors:  John R Votaw; Diego Martin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-12-11

3.  Flow-gated radial phase-contrast imaging in the presence of weak flow.

Authors:  Hsu-Hsia Peng; Teng-Yi Huang; Fu-Nien Wang; Hsiao-Wen Chung
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Functional imaging of murine hearts using accelerated self-gated UTE cine MRI.

Authors:  Abdallah G Motaal; Nils Noorman; Wolter L de Graaf; Verena Hoerr; Luc M J Florack; Klaas Nicolay; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Accelerated phase-contrast cine MRI using k-t SPARSE-SENSE.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Ricardo Otazo; Li Feng; Daniel K Sodickson; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Low Cost Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Compatible Stepper Exercise Device for Use in Cardiac Stress Tests.

Authors:  Omid Forouzan; Evan Flink; Jared Warczytowa; Nick Thate; Andrew Hanske; Tongkeun Lee; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Chris François; Oliver Wieben; Naomi C Chesler
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 0.582

7.  Comparison of self-gated cine MRI retrospective cardiac synchronization algorithms.

Authors:  Grace M Nijm; Alan V Sahakian; Steven Swiryn; James C Carr; John J Sheehan; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Sequential Turning Acquisition and Reconstruction (STAR) method for four-dimensional imaging of cyclically moving structures.

Authors:  Irina V Larina; Kirill V Larin; Mary E Dickinson; Michael Liebling
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  ECG-based gating in ultra high field cardiovascular magnetic resonance using an independent component analysis approach.

Authors:  Johannes W Krug; Georg Rose; Gari D Clifford; Julien Oster
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) gated MRI.

Authors:  Martyn N J Paley; Janet E Morris; Debbie Jarvis; Paul D Griffiths
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.