Literature DB >> 15333883

Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies.

L L Mandel1, S A Glantz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and understand the relationship between the tobacco and gambling industries in connection to their collaborative efforts to prevent smoke-free casinos and gambling facilities and fight smoke-free policies generally.
METHODS: Analysis of tobacco industry documents available online (accessed between February and December 2003).
RESULTS: The tobacco industry has worked to convince the gambling industry to fight against smoke-free environments. Representatives of the gambling industry with ties to the tobacco industry oppose smoke-free workplaces by claiming that smoke-free environments hurt gambling revenue and by promoting ventilation as a solution to secondhand smoke. With help from the tobacco industry, the gambling industry has become a force at the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers opposing smoke-free ventilation standards for the hospitality industry.
CONCLUSION: Tobacco industry strategies to mobilise the gambling industry to oppose smoke-free environments are consistent with past strategies to co-opt the hospitality industry and with strategies to influence policy from behind the scenes. Tobacco control advocates need to be aware of the connections between the tobacco and gambling industries in relation to smoke-free environments and work to expose them to the public and to policy makers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333883      PMCID: PMC1747893          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.007484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  24 in total

Review 1.  Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry.

Authors:  M Scollo; A Lal; A Hyland; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  "Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking.

Authors:  L Trotter; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  No association of smoke-free ordinances with profits from bingo and charitable games in Massachusetts.

Authors:  S A Glantz; R Wilson-Loots
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century.

Authors:  Theodore Tsoukalas; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Achieving a smokefree society.

Authors:  S A Glantz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control.

Authors:  M P Traynor; M E Begay; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule.

Authors:  Katherine Bryan-Jones; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The politics of local tobacco control.

Authors:  B Samuels; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  British Columbia capital regional district 100% smokefree bylaw: a successful public health campaign despite industry opposition.

Authors:  J Drope; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America.

Authors:  J Drope; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Philip Morris's Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it.

Authors:  P A McDaniel; E A Smith; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Gambling with our health: smoke-free policy would not reduce tribal casino patronage.

Authors:  Isaiah Shaneequa Brokenleg; Teresa K Barber; Nancy L Bennett; Simone Peart Boyce; Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Big tobacco "pull out all stops" for a landmark example: The Burswood Casino case.

Authors:  Bond Laura; Stafford Julia; Daube Mike
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-12-31

Review 4.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019.

Authors:  Amy Y Hafez; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Margarete C Kulik; Maya Vijayaraghavan; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Manufacturing credibility: the National Energy Management Institute and the Tobacco Institute's strategy for indoor air quality.

Authors:  Richard B Campbell; Edith D Balbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Protecting the world from secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: where do we stand and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Joaquin Barnoya; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  The role of corporate credibility in legitimizing disease promotion.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The pattern of indoor smoking restriction law transitions, 1970-2009: laws are sticky.

Authors:  Ashley Sanders-Jackson; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Brandon Zerbe; Anna V Song; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Accelerated Adoption of Smoke-Free Laws After Ratification of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Randy Uang; Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.