Literature DB >> 1920699

The politics of local tobacco control.

B Samuels1, S A Glantz.   

Abstract

Until the nonsmokers' rights movement, tobacco control activity was at the federal or state levels, which is where the tobacco industry dominates. Since the appearance of the nonsmokers' rights movement, progress in tobacco control has occurred primarily at the local level. In response to the success of this movement, the tobacco industry has developed "smokers' rights" groups and other tactics to fight local legislation. Several recent local campaigns in California illustrate these tactics. Tobacco control forces follow many paths, from sitting on the sidelines to making a serious commitment to smoking control legislation. Despite the tobacco industry's superior financial resources, the outcome of proposed local tobacco control legislation appears to depend on how seriously the health advocates mobilize in support of the local legislation. When the health community makes a serious commitment of time and resources, it wins. When it fails to make such a commitment, the tobacco industry prevails, more by default than by its superior financial resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1920699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  62 in total

1.  The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars.

Authors:  S Magzamen; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: how different are smokers and nonsmokers?

Authors:  M J Ashley; J Cohen; S Bull; R Ferrence; B Poland; L Pederson; J Gao
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.

Authors:  E K Ong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.

Authors:  Joanna V Dearlove; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Economic effect of restaurant smoking restrictions on restaurant business in Massachusetts, 1992 to 1998.

Authors:  William J Bartosch; G C Pope
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts.

Authors:  William J Bartosch; Gregory C Pope
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry.

Authors:  M Scollo; A Lal; A Hyland; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Association between local indoor smoking ordinances in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking during pregnancy: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  K H Nguyen; R J Wright; G Sorensen; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives.

Authors:  Mariaelena Gonzalez; Lawrence W Green; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  No association of smoke-free ordinances with profits from bingo and charitable games in Massachusetts.

Authors:  S A Glantz; R Wilson-Loots
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.