Literature DB >> 16728753

Philip Morris's Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it.

P A McDaniel1, E A Smith, R E Malone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the implications of Philip Morris USA's (PM's) overtures toward tobacco control and other public health organisations, 1995-2006. DATA SOURCES: Internal PM documents made available through multi-state US attorneys general lawsuits and other cases, and newspaper sources.
METHODS: Documents were retrieved from several industry documents websites and analysed using a case study approach.
RESULTS: PM's Project Sunrise, initiated in 1995 and proposed to continue through 2006, was a long-term plan to address tobacco industry delegitimisation and ensure the social acceptability of smoking and of the company itself. Project Sunrise laid out an explicit divide-and-conquer strategy against the tobacco control movement, proposing the establishment of relationships with PM-identified "moderate" tobacco control individuals and organisations and the marginalisation of others. PM planned to use "carefully orchestrated efforts" to exploit existing differences of opinion within tobacco control, weakening its opponents by working with them. PM also planned to thwart tobacco industry delegitimisation by repositioning itself as "responsible". We present evidence that these plans were implemented.
CONCLUSION: Sunrise exposes differences within the tobacco control movement that should be further discussed. The goal should not be consensus, but a better understanding of tensions within the movement. As the successes of the last 25 years embolden advocates to think beyond passage of the next clean indoor air policy or funding of the next cessation programme, movement philosophical differences may become more important. If tobacco control advocates are not ready to address them, Project Sunrise suggests that Philip Morris is ready to exploit them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16728753      PMCID: PMC2564663          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.014977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  34 in total

Review 1.  ASHRAE Standard 62: tobacco industry's influence over national ventilation standards.

Authors:  S Aguinaga Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  "Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking.

Authors:  L Trotter; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Thinking the "unthinkable": why Philip Morris considered quitting.

Authors:  E A Smith; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding.

Authors:  R E Malone; L A Bero
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Selling off or selling out? Medical schools and ethical leadership in tobacco stock divestment.

Authors:  Nathaniel Wander; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Altria means tobacco: Philip Morris's identity crisis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies.

Authors:  L L Mandel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 8.  Public health under attack: the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Jenny White; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The shredding of BAT's defence: McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia.

Authors:  J Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America.

Authors:  J Drope; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  36 in total

1.  Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives.

Authors:  Mariaelena Gonzalez; Lawrence W Green; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Global Fund needs to address conflict of interest.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Corporate image and public health: an analysis of the Philip Morris, Kraft, and Nestlé websites.

Authors:  Elizabeth Smith
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-03-16

4.  "What Is Our Story?" Philip Morris's Changing Corporate Narrative.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Working to make a disease.

Authors:  Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  FDA legislation.

Authors:  Michael Givel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Turning negative into positive: public health mass media campaigns and negative advertising.

Authors:  D E Apollonio; R E Malone
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2008-10-23

Review 8.  Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policy.

Authors:  Laura E Tesler; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Social branding to decrease smoking among young adults in bars.

Authors:  Pamela M Ling; Youn Ok Lee; Juliette Hong; Torsten B Neilands; Jeffrey W Jordan; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Philip Morris's health information web site appears responsible but undermines public health.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.462

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.