Literature DB >> 12893598

The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century.

Theodore Tsoukalas1, Stanton A Glantz.   

Abstract

Case study methodology was used to investigate the tobacco industry's strategies to fight local tobacco control efforts in Duluth, Minn. The industry opposed the clean indoor air ordinance indirectly through allies and front groups and directly in a referendum. Health groups failed to win a strong ordinance because they framed it as a youth issue rather than a workplace issue and failed to engage the industry's economic claims. Opponents' overexploitation of weaknesses in the ordinance allowed health advocates to construct a stronger version. Health advocates should assume that the tobacco industry will oppose all local tobacco control measures indirectly, directly, or both. Clean indoor air ordinances should be framed as workplace safety issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12893598      PMCID: PMC1447940          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  The implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws: policy implications for activists and the industry.

Authors:  P D Jacobson; J Wasserman
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.265

2.  The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars.

Authors:  S Magzamen; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Smoke-free restaurant ordinances do not affect restaurant business. Period.

Authors:  S A Glantz
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  1999-01

4.  Analysis of taxable sales receipts: was New York City's Smoke-Free Air Act bad for restaurant business?

Authors:  A Hyland; K M Cummings; E Nauenberg
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  1999-01

5.  Tourism and hotel revenues before and after passage of smoke-free restaurant ordinances.

Authors:  S A Glantz; A Charlesworth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Philip Morris's failed experiment in Pittsburgh.

Authors:  B E Samuels; M E Begay; A R Hazan; S A Glantz
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.265

7.  The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up.

Authors:  S A Glantz; L R Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control.

Authors:  M P Traynor; M E Begay; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales.

Authors:  S A Glantz; L R Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The politics of local tobacco control.

Authors:  B Samuels; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  18 in total

1.  Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Mariaelena Gonzalez; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  A Smoke-Free Paso del Norte: impact over 10 years on smoking prevalence using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Thom Taylor; Theodore V Cooper; Nora Hernandez; Michael Kelly; Jon Law; Brian Colwell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Free nicotine replacement therapy programs vs implementing smoke-free workplaces: a cost-effectiveness comparison.

Authors:  Michael K Ong; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Newspaper coverage of implementation of the Michigan smoke-free law: lessons learned.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuiper; Kate E Frantz; Molly Cotant; Stephen Babb; Jerelyn Jordan; Matthew Phelan
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2013-02-28

5.  Strong advocacy led to successful implementation of smokefree Mexico City.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  E-cigarette Policymaking by Local and State Governments: 2009-2014.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cox; Rachel Ann Barry; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies.

Authors:  L L Mandel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Public health foundations and the tobacco industry: lessons from Minnesota.

Authors:  J K Ibrahim; T H Tsoukalas; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Does the type of CIA policy significantly affect bar and restaurant employment in Minnesota cities?

Authors:  E G Klein; J L Forster; D J Erickson; L A Lytle; B Schillo
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2009-06

10.  The pattern of indoor smoking restriction law transitions, 1970-2009: laws are sticky.

Authors:  Ashley Sanders-Jackson; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Brandon Zerbe; Anna V Song; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.