Literature DB >> 15326131

Pressure phosphene self-tonometry: a comparison with goldmann tonometry in glaucoma patients.

Dennis S C Lam1, Dexter Y L Leung, Thomas Y H Chiu, Dorothy S P Fan, Eva Y Y Cheung, Tien-Yin Wong, Jimmy S M Lai, Clement C Y Tham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the pressure phosphene tonometer (PPT) is suitable for self-tonometry in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study of 102 eyes of 102 patients with chronic glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by the Goldmann tonometer (GT) were compared with self-measured readings with the PPT. Patients evaluated the ease of home use of the PPT. The last 15 patients were asked to stop their glaucoma medications, and the ability of the PPT to detect an elevated IOP during self-tonometry was studied.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD difference between PPT and GT readings was -0.24 +/- 1.57 mm Hg. Comparing the PPT with the GT, 86% of the readings were within +/- 2.0 mm Hg, and 91% were within +/- 3.0 mm Hg. Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.91. A Bland-Altman plot showed that the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods lay between 2.90 and -3.38 mm Hg. Within-subject coefficients of variation for the GT and the PPT were 4.4% and 7.3%, respectively. In detecting an elevated IOP of more than 21 mm Hg, the sensitivity and the specificity of the PPT were 92.3% and 98.6% respectively. The mean satisfaction score for home use of the PPT was 87.4 +/- 16.3 (maximum 100).
CONCLUSIONS: With proper training and technique, self-tonometry with the PPT appears to be accurate up to at least 25 mm Hg and is reproducible. The PPT was sensitive and specific in detecting an elevated IOP of more than 21 mm Hg. As patients were expected to seek ophthalmic care before the self-measured IOP reaches 25 mm Hg, the PPT may have a value for self-monitoring. Patients rated the PPT as satisfactory for home use. Because the PPT is portable and relatively inexpensive and requires no topical anesthesia or direct contact with the eyeball, it may have potential as an instrument for home self-tonometry. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15326131     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

Review 1.  Rebound tonometry: new opportunities and limitations of non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  A Cervino
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children.

Authors:  Ida Chung; Amelia Bartolone; William H Swanson; Andrea P Thau
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Is 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring necessary in glaucoma?

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.975

Review 4.  An overview of home tonometry and telemetry for intraocular pressure monitoring in humans.

Authors:  Edward Yung; Valerie Trubnik; L Jay Katz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of intraocular tonometry using three different non-invasive tonometers in children.

Authors:  Julia Lasseck; Thomas Jehle; Nicolas Feltgen; Wolf Alexander Lagrèze
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The road ahead to continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in glaucoma.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-04

Review 7.  Diurnal Variation of IOP in Angle Closure Disease: Are We Doing Enough?

Authors:  Shibal Bhartiya; Meenakshi Wadhwani; Oshin Rai; Mariah Patuel; Syril Dorairaj; Kumar Namagiri Sirish
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

8.  A pilot study for intraocular pressure measurements based on vibroacoustic parameters.

Authors:  Deukha Kim; Youngbeen Chung; Yeji Yeon; Hyunsoo Cho; Han Woong Lim; Junhong Park; Won June Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Ageing and ocular surface immunity.

Authors:  Alireza Mashaghi; Jiaxu Hong; Sunil K Chauhan; Reza Dana
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.638

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.