Literature DB >> 18553097

Comparison of intraocular tonometry using three different non-invasive tonometers in children.

Julia Lasseck1, Thomas Jehle, Nicolas Feltgen, Wolf Alexander Lagrèze.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In childhood glaucoma, the correct determination of intraocular pressure (IOP) is crucial in clinical decision-making. We therefore investigated how intraocular tonometry readings correlate with readings from commonly used tonometers.
METHODS: IOP was measured unilaterally in 20 children suffering from congenital (n = 7) or secondary glaucoma (n = 13), 10 minutes after the induction of general anaesthesia. The children were aged from 1 month to 17 years (mean age 4.3 years, median age 1.3 years). Non-invasive applanation (Tono-Pen XL, Perkins tonometer) and indentation tonometry (Schiötz tonometer) were performed in random order prior to intraocular tonometry with a 26-gauge needle connected to a pressure sensor. Linear regression analysis and the coefficients of variance (CV) were used to compare the data obtained from the various tonometers.
RESULTS: Compared with intraocular pressure, the CV was 10% for the Tono-Pen XL, 17% for the Schiötz, and 19% for the Perkins tonometer. The coefficient of determination (r(2)) was 0.74 for Tono-Pen XL, 0.60 for Schiötz and 0.78 for Perkins tonometry. The IOP values obtained with the Tono-Pen XL scattered homogeneously around the intraocular IOP, while the Perkins and Schiötz tonometers underestimated intraocular measured IOP.
CONCLUSION: Of the three tonometers evaluated in this series of paediatric glaucoma patients, the Tono-Pen XL most closely reflected true IOP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18553097     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0863-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  24 in total

1.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.

Authors:  N Feltgen; D Leifert; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  [More than 4 years' experience with electronic intraocular needle tonometry].

Authors:  W Marx; F Madjlessi; T Reinhard; C Althaus; R Sundmacher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

Authors:  Archana Bhan; Andrew C Browning; Sunil Shah; Robin Hamilton; Dinesh Dave; Harminder S Dua
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  [Clinical discrepancy between Schiötz and Perkins Tonometry in juvenile glaucoma].

Authors:  T S Dietlein; P C Jacobi; G K Krieglstein
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 0.700

7.  Comparison of the effects of isoflurane and halothane on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  R K Mirakhur; P Elliott; W F Shepherd; J N McGalliard
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states.

Authors:  Christoph Kniestedt; Michelle Nee; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  The effects of sevoflurane and ketamine on intraocular pressure in children during examination under anesthesia.

Authors:  Dana Blumberg; Nathan Congdon; Henry Jampel; Donna Gilbert; Richard Elliott; Richard Rivers; Beatrice Munoz; Harry Quigley
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  [Central and peripheral corneal thickness: influence on the iop measurement by Tonopen].

Authors:  Willer Otávio Guimarães Amaral; Roberto Márcio Batista Teixeira; Leandro Moulin Alencar; Sebastião Cronemberger; Nassim Calixto
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 0.872

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of congenital and early childhood cataract.

Authors:  Wolf A Lagrèze
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Schiotz tonometry.

Authors:  David Ponka; Faisal Baddar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Comparison of intraocular pressures at different points in human's cornea before and after laser in situ keratomileusis with tono-pen tonometer.

Authors:  Xinyu Li; Guigang Li; Lei Liu; Jing Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2011-02-19

4.  The effect of parental factors in children with large cup-to-disc ratios.

Authors:  Hae-Young Lopilly Park; Min Ji Ha; Sun Young Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluating the Variation of Intraocular Pressure With Positional Change During Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery: Observational Study.

Authors:  Parveen Vitish-Sharma; Anthony J King; Richard Stead; John Sharp; Ali Abbas; Boliang Guo; Christopher Gornall; Charles Maxwell-Armstrong; Austin G Acheson
Journal:  JMIR Perioper Med       Date:  2018-09-04

Review 6.  Challenges in the complex management of post-keratoplasty glaucoma.

Authors:  Lisa-Marie Anders; Zisis Gatzioufas; Matthias C Grieshaber
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.