Literature DB >> 15326044

16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation.

A M Groves1, K E Owen, H M Courtney, S J Yates, K E Goldstone, G M Blake, A K Dixon.   

Abstract

Computer simulations are widely used to estimate effective doses from CT examinations. The raw data often used in their estimations were obtained some years ago and made certain assumptions regarding CT unit design. At that time multidetector CT units were unavailable. Changes in design will limit the accuracy of computer simulated dosimetry on these machines. We therefore estimated CT dose on a 16-detector unit directly using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and an anthropomorphic phantom. We found that the dose measured directly was 18% higher than the computer simulated dosimetry, in keeping with the previously recognised underestimation by computer simulation techniques compared with TLD measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15326044     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/48307881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  19 in total

1.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program.

Authors:  C Hohl; G Mühlenbruch; J E Wildberger; C Leidecker; C Süss; T Schmidt; R W Günther; A H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.

Authors:  Boris Nikolic; Faisal Khosa; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Atif N Khan; Sheryar Sarwar; Chun-Shan Yam; Laurence E Court; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Y M Kwok; F G Irani; K H Tay; C C Yang; C G Padre; B S Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT.

Authors:  B Huang; J Li; M W-M Law; J Zhang; Y Shen; P L Khong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Can ultrasound guidance reduce radiation exposure significantly in percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients?

Authors:  Gulsah Bayram Ilikan; Bilge Karabulut; H Tugrul Tiryaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Radiation doses for pregnant women in the late pregnancy undergoing fetal-computed tomography: a comparison of dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Masanao Kobayashi; Shigetaka Suzuki; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-09-19

8.  Comparison of effective dose and lifetime risk of cancer incidence of CT attenuation correction acquisitions and radiopharmaceutical administration for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  A K Tootell; K Szczepura; P Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Radiation dose evaluation in 64-slice CT examinations with adult and paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  K Fujii; T Aoyama; C Yamauchi-Kawaura; S Koyama; M Yamauchi; S Ko; K Akahane; K Nishizawa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma?

Authors:  Pierre Vera; Matthieu John Ouvrier; Sébastien Hapdey; Marc Thillays; Anne Sophie Pesquet; Brigitte Diologent; Françoise Callonec; Anne Hitzel; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Jean François Ménard; Fabrice Jardin; Hervé Tilly
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.