Literature DB >> 15316629

[Check of hearing aid fitting].

K Schorn1.   

Abstract

A qualified hearing aid fitting is only possible if the ENT doctor not only prescribes the device, but also conscientiously checks the comparative adjustments made by the hearing aid acoustician. In deciding, which of the tested hearing aids achieves the best and most appropriate improvement of hearing, the physician should first thoroughly study the acoustician's fitting protocol, which contains comparative results of all devices tested. The subjective satisfaction of the patient with his hearing aid can be determined in a detailed conversation or with a special questionnaire. The examination of the otoplastic is as necessary as the improvement of speech discrimination under free field conditions, especially with additional noise. With in situ measurement, the individual transmission characteristics of the hearing aid and the otoplastic are tested in a few minutes. Conscientious control of the fitted hearing aid is only possible with loudness scaling. The scaling function shows clearly whether the fitted aid has adequate amplification, is not too loudly adjusted, and whether the field of pleasant hearing has been considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316629     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1131-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  4 in total

1.  [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies].

Authors:  K Schorn; U Baumann
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  [Reference curves for hearing surface scaling in clinical use].

Authors:  U Baumann; I Stemplinger; B Arnold; K Schorn
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; M Wesselkamp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  B Hagerman
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1982
  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].

Authors:  A Müller; T Hocke; U Hoppe; P Mir-Salim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test].

Authors:  M Kompis; M Krebs; R Häusler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [New aspects of hearing aid fitting in noise-induced hearing loss].

Authors:  J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Contribution to the discussion surrounding the Freiburg speech test].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; J Kießling; J Müller-Deile; T Steffens; H v Wedel; W H Döring; M Buschermöhle; K Wagener; T Brand
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast; T Hocke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].

Authors:  U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].

Authors:  Max Engler; Frank Digeser; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.330

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.