Literature DB >> 16189713

[Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test].

M Kompis1, M Krebs, R Häusler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test five test words from the original German recording which are rarely used in Switzerland have been exchanged. Furthermore, differences in the transfer functions between headphone and loudspeaker presentation are not taken into account during calibration. New settings for the levels of the individual test words in the recommended recording and small changes in calibration procedures led us to make a verification of the currently used normative values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Speech intelligibility was measured in 20 subjects with normal hearing using monosyllabic words and numbers via headphones and loudspeakers.
RESULTS: On average, 50% speech intelligibility was reached at levels which were 7.5 dB lower under free-field conditions than for headphone presentation. The average difference between numbers and monosyllabic words was found to be 9.6 dB, which is considerably lower than the 14 dB of the current normative curves.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a good agreement between our measurements and the normative values for tests using monosyllabic words and headphones, but not for numbers or free-field measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16189713     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-005-1337-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  6 in total

1.  [Check of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  K Schorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization.

Authors:  Y S Sininger; B Cone-Wesson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  [Identifying factors before the provision of hearing aids. Results from a pilot study].

Authors:  H Meister; I Lausberg; H von Wedel; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Factors influencing rehabilitation of sensorineural hearing loss with hearing aids].

Authors:  S Brosch; L Michels; P S Mauz; H de Maddalena; H Löwenheim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Problems of central high grade hearing losses].

Authors:  E König
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1968

6.  [Audiologic diagnosis in children. Applicability of different speech material].

Authors:  F Feldhusen; L Möhring; M Brunner; J Troost; C Spielberger; L Braun-Frank; D Schoenfelder; U Pröschel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.284

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  [Testing the comparability of free-field and HDA200 headphone measurements for the Freiburg speech test].

Authors:  C Thiele; N Wardenga; T Lenarz; A Büchner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].

Authors:  T Memmeler; R Schönweiler; B Wollenberg; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Non-organic hearing loss: new and confirmed findings.

Authors:  Alexandra Holenweg; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Correlation between Speech Perception Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation and Postoperative Acoustic and Electric Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Ursina Rüegg; Adrian Dalbert; Dorothe Veraguth; Christof Röösli; Alexander Huber; Flurin Pfiffner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Influence of Compression Thresholds and Maximum Power Output on Speech Understanding with Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Tom Gawliczek; Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.