Literature DB >> 7178810

Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise.

B Hagerman.   

Abstract

A list of ten spoken Swedish sentences was computer edited to obtain new lists with exactly the same content of sound, but with new sentences. A noise was synthesized from the speech material by the computer to produce exactly the same spectrum of speech and noise. The noise was also amplitude modulated by a low frequency noise to make it sound more natural. This material was tested monaurally on 20 normal-hearing subjects. The equality in intelligibility of some of the lists was investigated. Repeated threshold measurements in noise showed a standard deviation of 0.44 dB when the learning effect was outbalanced. Only a small part of the learning effect was due to learning of the word material. Intelligibility curves fitted to the data points in noise and without noise showed maximum steepnesses of 25 and 10%/dB respectively. At constant signal to noise ratio (S/N) the best performance was achieved at a speech level of 53 dB.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7178810     DOI: 10.3109/01050398209076203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  55 in total

1.  [Check of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  K Schorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].

Authors:  M Hey; G Brademann; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jӧrg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Current trends in implantable hearing AIDS.

Authors:  M Chasin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-09

7.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  The effects of dosage and duration of auditory training for older adults with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Dana L Kinney; Sara E Brown; Anna L Kiener; Tera M Quigley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.