Literature DB >> 18535933

Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.

Kathryn A Phillips1, Su-Ying Liang, Stephanie Van Bebber.   

Abstract

It is important to understand how knowledge of genomics can be translated from research into clinical practice and health policies. This review examines existing evidence on three key factors in the adoption of personalized medicine: utilization, preferences, and economic value, using two cancer examples: HER2/neu antigen testing and trastuzumab (Herceptin) treatment and genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Our findings highlight areas in which additional research is required to build an evidence base addressing utilization of, preferences for, and the potential costs and benefits of personalized medicine. Major challenges include a lack of linked data, the need for relevant research frameworks and methodologies, and the clinical complexities of genomic-based diagnostics and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18535933      PMCID: PMC2910510     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther        ISSN: 1464-8431


  58 in total

1.  How interested is the public in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility? Report of a cross-sectional population survey.

Authors:  I D Graham; D M Logan; R Hughes-Benzie; W K Evans; H Perras; L M McAuley; A Laupacis; H Stern
Journal:  Cancer Prev Control       Date:  1998-08

2.  Perceptions of genetic risk assessment and education among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients and implications for physicians.

Authors:  H M Todora; C S Skinner; L Gidday; J L Ivanovich; S Rawl; A J Whelan
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Psychosocial factors associated with the public's willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model.

Authors:  K Bosompra; T Ashikaga; B S Flynn; J K Worden; L J Solomon
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2001-04

4.  Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups.

Authors:  K Glanz; J Grove; C Lerman; C Gotay; L Le Marchand
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations.

Authors:  N A Press; Y Yasui; S Reynolds; S J Durfy; W Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-03-01

6.  Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.

Authors:  A M Codori; G M Petersen; D L Miglioretti; E K Larkin; M T Bushey; C Young; J D Brensinger; K Johnson; J A Bacon; S V Booker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Evaluating HER2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Bartlett; J J Going; E A Mallon; A D Watters; J R Reeves; P Stanton; J Richmond; B Donald; R Ferrier; T G Cooke
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; C Hughes; B J Trock; R E Myers; D Main; A Bonney; M R Abbaszadegan; A E Harty; B A Franklin; J F Lynch; H T Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Genetic testing for colorectal carcinoma susceptibility: focus group responses of individuals with colorectal carcinoma and first-degree relatives.

Authors:  A Y Kinney; B M DeVellis; C Skrzynia; R Millikan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cost-effectiveness of microsatellite instability screening as a method for detecting hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; L Clarke; R Etzioni; M Higashi; K Berry; N Urban
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  13 in total

1.  Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?

Authors:  Ilia L Ferrusi; Natasha B Leighl; Nathalie A Kulin; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?

Authors:  Ilia L Ferrusi; Natasha B Leighl; Nathalie A Kulin; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Capacity building for assessing new technologies: approaches to examining personalized medicine in practice.

Authors:  Stephanie L Van Bebber; Julia R Trosman; Su-Ying Liang; Grace Wang; Deborah A Marshall; Sara Knight; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Tradeoffs of using administrative claims and medical records to identify the use of personalized medicine for patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Su-Ying Liang; Kathryn A Phillips; Grace Wang; Carol Keohane; Joanne Armstrong; William M Morris; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  HER2 evaluation and its impact on breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  K A B Goddard; S Weinmann; K Richert-Boe; C Chen; J Bulkley; C Wax
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Paving the Way to Personalized Genomic Medicine: Steps to Successful Implementation.

Authors:  Jennifer L Fackler; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2009-06-01

7.  Utilization of HER2 genetic testing in a multi-institutional observational study.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Laurel A Habel; Sharon Hensley Alford; Catherine A McCarty; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Adedayo A Onitilo; Alanna K Rahm; Jennifer A Webster
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  The economic value of personalized medicine tests: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Julie Ann Sakowski; Julia Trosman; Michael P Douglas; Su-Ying Liang; Peter Neumann
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Issues surrounding the health economic evaluation of genomic technologies.

Authors:  James Buchanan; Sarah Wordsworth; Anna Schuh
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.533

10.  Closing the personalized medicine information gap: HER2 test documentation practice.

Authors:  Ilia L Ferrusi; Craig C Earle; Maureen Trudeau; Natasha B Leighl; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Hoa Khong; Jeffrey S Hoch; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.