Literature DB >> 15310807

Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.

Angela Harden1, Jo Garcia, Sandy Oliver, Rebecca Rees, Jonathan Shepherd, Ginny Brunton, Ann Oakley.   

Abstract

Methods for systematic reviews are well developed for trials, but not for non-experimental or qualitative research. This paper describes the methods developed for reviewing research on people's perspectives and experiences ("views" studies) alongside trials within a series of reviews on young people's mental health, physical activity, and healthy eating. Reports of views studies were difficult to locate; could not easily be classified as "qualitative" or "quantitative"; and often failed to meet seven basic methodological reporting standards used in a newly developed quality assessment tool. Synthesising views studies required the adaptation of qualitative analysis techniques. The benefits of bringing together views studies in a systematic way included gaining a greater breadth of perspectives and a deeper understanding of public health issues from the point of view of those targeted by interventions. A systematic approach also aided reflection on study methods that may distort, misrepresent, or fail to pick up people's views. This methodology is likely to create greater opportunities for people's own perspectives and experiences to inform policies to promote their health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15310807      PMCID: PMC1732892          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.014829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  14 in total

1.  A synthesis of qualitative home visiting research.

Authors:  D B McNaughton
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.462

Review 2.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  P Jüni; D G Altman; M Egger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

3.  Summarising economic evaluations in systematic reviews: a new approach.

Authors:  J Nixon; K S Khan; J Kleijnen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

4.  Enduring love: a grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence.

Authors:  M H Kearney
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; R Fitzpatrick; K Roberts
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.

Authors:  J Popay; A Rogers; G Williams
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1998-05

Review 7.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

8.  Metasynthesis of qualitative research on living with HIV infection.

Authors:  J Barroso; G M Powell-Cope
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2000-05

9.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.

Authors:  Rona Campbell; Pandora Pound; Catherine Pope; Nicky Britten; Roisin Pill; Myfanwy Morgan; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals.

Authors:  A K Cobb; J N Hagemaster
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.726

View more
  81 in total

Review 1.  Older people's perspectives on fall risk and fall prevention programs: a literature review.

Authors:  Siobhan McMahon; Kristine M Talley; Jean F Wyman
Journal:  Int J Older People Nurs       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.115

Review 2.  Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden; Ann Oakley; Sandy Oliver; Katy Sutcliffe; Rebecca Rees; Ginny Brunton; Josephine Kavanagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-24

Review 3.  Views on traditional Chinese medicine amongst Chinese population: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  Vincent C H Chung; Polly H X Ma; Chun Hong Lau; Samuel Y S Wong; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

Review 6.  Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review.

Authors:  Johan Thor; Jonas Lundberg; Jakob Ask; Jesper Olsson; Cheryl Carli; Karin Pukk Härenstam; Mats Brommels
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-10

Review 7.  Doctors as patients: a systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience.

Authors:  Margaret Kay; Geoffrey Mitchell; Alexandra Clavarino; Jenny Doust
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Making Sense of Qualitative and Quantitative Findings in Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.

Authors:  Corrine I Voils; Margarete Sandelowski; Julie Barroso; Victor Hasselblad
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2008

9.  Informing policy making and management in healthcare: the place for synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Pope; Nicholas Mays; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

Review 10.  Revisiting the evidence on health and health care disparities among the Roma: a systematic review 2003-2012.

Authors:  Benjamin Cook; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Anne Valentine; Anna Lessios; Ethan Yeh
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.