Literature DB >> 3035126

Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals.

A K Cobb, J N Hagemaster.   

Abstract

With the proliferation of interest in qualitative research in nursing comes the attendant problem of how to evaluate it appropriately. Qualitative research has its own unique history, philosophical foundations, and methodologies that separate it from the quantitative approach. Although the literature is crowded with guidelines for evaluating the latter, little is offered for the qualitative reviewer. The Research Proposal Evaluation Form: Qualitative Methodology is a partial solution to this dilemma. It provides a framework for critiquing the proposal phase of a qualitative study and can be an important guide both for the educator and for the novice researcher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3035126     DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-19870401-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Educ        ISSN: 0148-4834            Impact factor:   1.726


  11 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies.

Authors:  C Treloar; S Champness; P L Simpson; N Higginbotham
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.

Authors:  Angela Harden; Jo Garcia; Sandy Oliver; Rebecca Rees; Jonathan Shepherd; Ginny Brunton; Ann Oakley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden; Ann Oakley; Sandy Oliver; Katy Sutcliffe; Rebecca Rees; Ginny Brunton; Josephine Kavanagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-24

4.  A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2004-08

Review 5.  A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.

Authors:  Teresa A O'Sullivan; Curtis G Jefferson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Negotiating Peril: The Lived Experience of Rural, Low-Income Women Exposed to IPV During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Authors:  Camille Burnett; Donna Schminkey; Juliane Milburn; Jennifer Kastello; Linda Bullock; Jacquelyn Campbell; Phyllis Sharps
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 7.  Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.

Authors:  Michael Hurley; Kelly Dickson; Rachel Hallett; Robert Grant; Hanan Hauari; Nicola Walsh; Claire Stansfield; Sandy Oliver
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 8.  Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Angela Harden; Ginny Brunton; Adam Fletcher; Ann Oakley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-12

9.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  The Experience of Caregivers Living with Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Peeranuch LeSeure; Supaporn Chongkham-Ang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.