| Literature DB >> 18677415 |
Corrine I Voils1, Margarete Sandelowski, Julie Barroso, Victor Hasselblad.
Abstract
The synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research findings is increasingly promoted, but many of the conceptual and methodological issues it raises have yet to be fully understood and resolved. In this article, we describe how we handled issues encountered in efforts to synthesize the findings in forty-two reports of studies of antiretroviral adherence in HIV-positive women in the course of an ongoing study to develop methods to synthesize qualitative and quantitative research findings in common domains of health-related research. Working with these reports underscored the importance of looking past method claims and ideals and directly at the findings themselves, differentiating between aggregative syntheses in which findings are assimilated and interpretive syntheses in which they are configured, and understanding the judgments involved in designating relationships between findings as confirmatory, divergent, or complementary.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18677415 PMCID: PMC2493048 DOI: 10.1177/1525822X07307463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Field methods ISSN: 1525-822X