Literature DB >> 12560003

Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.

Rona Campbell1, Pandora Pound, Catherine Pope, Nicky Britten, Roisin Pill, Myfanwy Morgan, Jenny Donovan.   

Abstract

Interest in how qualitative health research might be used more widely to inform health policy and medical practice is growing. Synthesising findings from individual qualitative studies may be one method but application of conventional systematic review methodology to qualitative research presents significant philosophical and practical challenges. The aim here was to examine the feasibility of synthesising qualitative research using qualitative methodology including a formative evaluation of criteria for assessing the research to be synthesised. Ten qualitative studies of adult patients' perspectives of diabetes were purposefully selected and questions proposed by the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) adapted and used to assess papers prior to synthesis. Each study was reviewed independently by two experienced social scientists. The level of agreement between reviewers was determined. Three papers were excluded: one because it turned out not to be qualitative research, one because the quality of the empirical work was poor and one because the qualitative findings reported were also recorded in another paper already included. The synthesis, which had two distinct elements, was conducted using the meta-ethnographic method. Firstly, four papers containing typologies of patient responses to diabetes were synthesised. Secondly, six key concepts were identified from all seven papers as being important in enabling a person with diabetes to achieve a balance in their lives and to attain a sense of well-being and control. These included: time and experience, trust in self, a less subservient approach to care providers, strategic non-compliance with medication, effective support from care providers and an acknowledgement that diabetes is serious. None of the studies included in the synthesis referenced any of the early papers nor did they appear to have taken account of or built upon previous findings. This evaluation confirmed that meta-ethnography can lead to a synthesis and extension of qualitative research in a defined field of study. In addition, from it a practical method of qualitative research assessment evolved. This process is promising but requires further testing and evaluation before it could be recommended for more widespread adoption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560003     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  189 in total

1.  Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?

Authors:  Wendy L Lipworth; Heather M Davey; Stacy M Carter; Claire Hooker; Wendy Hu
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The problem of appraising qualitative research.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; R L Shaw; S Agarwal; J A Smith
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-06

Review 3.  Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.

Authors:  Angela Harden; Jo Garcia; Sandy Oliver; Rebecca Rees; Jonathan Shepherd; Ginny Brunton; Ann Oakley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Exploratory Health Disparities Research: The Need to Provide a Tangible Benefit to Vulnerable Respondents.

Authors:  Maghboeba Mosavel; Christian Simon
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010

Review 5.  A meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's experience of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Elaine Burns; Virginia Schmied; Athena Sheehan; Jennifer Fenwick
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Low-income mothers, nutrition and health: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Pamela Attree
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  A critical analysis of UK public health policies in relation to diet and nutrition in low-income households.

Authors:  Pamela Attree
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

Review 9.  Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Claire Glenton; Catherine Pope
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.