Literature DB >> 15306290

Genome size and extinction risk in vertebrates.

Alexander E Vinogradov1.   

Abstract

The hypothesis of 'selfish DNA' is tested for the case of animals using the relation between genome size and conservation status of a given species. In contrast to plants, where the larger genome was previously shown to increase the likelihood of extinction, the picture is more complicated in animals. At the within-families and within-orders levels, the larger genome increases the risk of extinction only in reptiles and birds (which have the smallest genomes among tetrapods). In fishes and amphibians, the effect is caused by the higher taxonomic levels (above order). In several phylogenetic lineages of anamniotes, there is a correlation between a higher fraction of threatened species and a lower number of extant species in a lineage with the larger genome. In mammals, no effect was observed at any taxonomic level. The obtained data support the concept of hierarchical selection. It is also shown that, in plants and reptiles, the probability of being threatened increases from less than 10% to more than 80% with the increase in genome size, which can help in establishing conservation priorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15306290      PMCID: PMC1691778          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

1.  A bird's-eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class aves.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Reptiles: a group of transition in the evolution of genome size and of the nucleotypic effect.

Authors:  E Olmo
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Buffering: a possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1998-07-27       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-02-01

6.  Plant genome values: how much do we know?

Authors:  M D Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies.

Authors:  H Szarski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-11-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution.

Authors:  W F Doolittle; C Sapienza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite.

Authors:  L E Orgel; F H Crick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Dryness increases predation risk in efts: support for an amphibian decline hypothesis.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Dale M Madison
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genome size and chromatin condensation in vertebrates.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Genome size and metabolic intensity in tetrapods: a tale of two lines.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov; Olga V Anatskaya
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Dmitri Petrov; David Ackerly; Paul Falkowski; Oscar M Schofield
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation.

Authors:  John H Werren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Endangered species hold clues to human evolution.

Authors:  Craig B Lowe; Gill Bejerano; Sofie R Salama; David Haussler
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Genome Size and Species Diversification.

Authors:  Ken Kraaijeveld
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.119

7.  The miniature genome of a carnivorous plant Genlisea aurea contains a low number of genes and short non-coding sequences.

Authors:  Evgeny V Leushkin; Roman A Sutormin; Elena R Nabieva; Aleksey A Penin; Alexey S Kondrashov; Maria D Logacheva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Accommodating the load: The transposable element content of very large genomes.

Authors:  Cushla J Metcalfe; Didier Casane
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2013-03-01

9.  Different Evolutionary Paths to Complexity for Small and Large Populations of Digital Organisms.

Authors:  Thomas LaBar; Christoph Adami
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Novel Insights into Plant Genome Evolution and Adaptation as Revealed through Transposable Elements and Non-Coding RNAs in Conifers.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.