Literature DB >> 15647899

Genome size and chromatin condensation in vertebrates.

Alexander E Vinogradov1.   

Abstract

Cell membrane-dependent chromatin condensation was studied by flow cytometry in erythrocytes of 36 species from six classes of vertebrates. A positive relationship was found between the degree of condensation and genome size. The distribution of variances among taxonomic levels is similar for both parameters. However, chromatin condensation varied relatively more at the lower taxonomic levels, which suggests that the degree of DNA packaging might serve for fine-tuning the 'skeletal' and/or 'buffering' function of noncoding DNA (although the range of this fine-tuning is smaller than the range of genome size changes). For two closely related amphibian species differing in genome size, change in chromatin condensation under the action of elevated extracellular salinity was investigated. Condensation was steadier and its reaction to changes in solvent composition was more inertial in the species with a larger genome, which is in agreement with the buffering function postulated for redundant DNA. The uppermost genome size in vertebrates (and in living beings in general) was updated using flow cytometry and was found to be about 80 pg (78,400 Mb). The widespread opinion that the largest genome occurs in unicellular organisms is rejected as being based on artifacts.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647899     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-004-0323-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  53 in total

1.  K562 cells implicate increased chromatin accessibility in Alu transcriptional activation.

Authors:  T H Li; C Kim; C M Rubin; C W Schmid
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A bird's-eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class aves.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Human housekeeping genes are compact.

Authors:  Eli Eisenberg; Erez Y Levanon
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Buffering: a possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1998-07-27       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-02-01

7.  Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies.

Authors:  H Szarski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-11-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Mass isolated ameba nuclei. I. Isolation procedure and determination of macromolecular composition and RNA polymerase activity.

Authors:  K J Tautvydas
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Anuran amphibia which are not acclimable to high salt, tolerate high plasma urea.

Authors:  S Shpun; J Hoffman; U Katz
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol       Date:  1992-11

Review 10.  Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox.

Authors:  T Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A guided tour of large genome size in animals: what we know and where we are heading.

Authors:  France Dufresne; Nicholas Jeffery
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology?

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Bures; Petr Smarda; Tomás Pavlícek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Sister chromatids are often incompletely aligned in meristematic and endopolyploid interphase nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Marco Klatte; Ales Pecinka; Armin Meister; Zuzana Jasencakova; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genome size and metabolic intensity in tetrapods: a tale of two lines.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov; Olga V Anatskaya
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Towards understanding the epigenetics of transcription by chromatin structure and the nuclear matrix.

Authors:  Rui Pires Martins; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Gene Ther Mol Biol       Date:  2005

Review 6.  An insight into understanding the coupling between homologous recombination mediated DNA repair and chromatin remodeling mechanisms in plant genome: an update.

Authors:  Samrat Banerjee; Sujit Roy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 5.173

7.  Noncoding DNA, isochores and gene expression: nucleosome formation potential.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Phylostratic Shift of Whole-Genome Duplications in Normal Mammalian Tissues towards Unicellularity Is Driven by Developmental Bivalent Genes and Reveals a Link to Cancer.

Authors:  Olga V Anatskaya; Alexander E Vinogradov; Ninel M Vainshelbaum; Alessandro Giuliani; Jekaterina Erenpreisa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Evolution of histone 2A for chromatin compaction in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Benjamin R Macadangdang; Amit Oberai; Tanya Spektor; Oscar A Campos; Fang Sheng; Michael F Carey; Maria Vogelauer; Siavash K Kurdistani
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Genome: Divergence with the Barred Owl (Strix varia) and Characterization of Light-Associated Genes.

Authors:  Zachary R Hanna; James B Henderson; Jeffrey D Wall; Christopher A Emerling; Jérôme Fuchs; Charles Runckel; David P Mindell; Rauri C K Bowie; Joseph L DeRisi; John P Dumbacher
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.