Literature DB >> 17420184

The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes.

Matthew J Oliver1, Dmitri Petrov, David Ackerly, Paul Falkowski, Oscar M Schofield.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic genome size varies over five orders of magnitude; however, the distribution is strongly skewed toward small values. Genome size is highly correlated to a number of phenotypic traits, suggesting that the relative lack of large genomes in eukaryotes is due to selective removal. Using phylogenetic contrasts, we show that the rate of genome size evolution is proportional to genome size, with the fastest rates occurring in the largest genomes. This trend is evident across the 20 major eukaryotic clades analyzed, indicating that over long time scales, proportional change is the dominant and universal mode of genome-size evolution in eukaryotes. Our results reveal that the evolution of eukaryotic genome size can be described by a simple proportional model of evolution. This model explains the skewed distribution of eukaryotic genome sizes without invoking strong selection against large genomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17420184      PMCID: PMC1855170          DOI: 10.1101/gr.6096207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  35 in total

1.  A bird's-eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class aves.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts.

Authors:  R Díaz-Uriarte; T Garland
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes.

Authors:  Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Is small indel bias a determinant of genome size?

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling.

Authors:  J Kozłowski; M Konarzewski; A T Gawelczyk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rate tests for phenotypic evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts.

Authors:  T Garland
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Frameshift errors initiated by nucleotide misincorporation.

Authors:  K Bebenek; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The frequency distribution of gene family sizes in complete genomes.

Authors:  M A Huynen; E van Nimwegen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos; James K M Brown; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  A guided tour of large genome size in animals: what we know and where we are heading.

Authors:  France Dufresne; Nicholas Jeffery
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Genome size scaling through phenotype space.

Authors:  Charles A Knight; Jeremy M Beaulieu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  A universal driver of macroevolutionary change in the size of marine phytoplankton over the Cenozoic.

Authors:  Z V Finkel; J Sebbo; S Feist-Burkhardt; A J Irwin; M E Katz; O M E Schofield; J R Young; P G Falkowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The genome sizes of megabats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) are remarkably constrained.

Authors:  Jillian D L Smith; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Palaeogenomics of pterosaurs and the evolution of small genome size in flying vertebrates.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Nutrient reserves may allow for genome size increase: evidence from comparison of geophytes and their sister non-geophytic relatives.

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Bureš; Petr Šmarda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Nikolas J Muenke; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  A model for genome size evolution.

Authors:  Stephan Fischer; Samuel Bernard; Guillaume Beslon; Carole Knibbe
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  The exceptionally large chloroplast genome of the green alga Floydiella terrestris illuminates the evolutionary history of the Chlorophyceae.

Authors:  Jean-Simon Brouard; Christian Otis; Claude Lemieux; Monique Turmel
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Genome size differentiates co-occurring populations of the planktonic diatom Ditylum brightwellii (Bacillariophyta).

Authors:  Julie A Koester; Jarred E Swalwell; Peter von Dassow; E Virginia Armbrust
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.