Literature DB >> 16519230

Genome size and metabolic intensity in tetrapods: a tale of two lines.

Alexander E Vinogradov1, Olga V Anatskaya.   

Abstract

We show the negative link between genome size and metabolic intensity in tetrapods, using the heart index (relative heart mass) as a unified indicator of metabolic intensity in poikilothermal and homeothermal animals. We found two separate regression lines of heart index on genome size for reptiles-birds and amphibians-mammals (the slope of regression is steeper in reptiles-birds). We also show a negative correlation between GC content and nucleosome formation potential in vertebrate DNA, and, consistent with this relationship, a positive correlation between genome GC content and nuclear size (independent of genome size). It is known that there are two separate regression lines of genome GC content on genome size for reptiles-birds and amphibians-mammals: reptiles-birds have the relatively higher GC content (for their genome sizes) compared to amphibians-mammals. Our results suggest uniting all these data into one concept. The slope of negative regression between GC content and nucleosome formation potential is steeper in exons than in non-coding DNA (where nucleosome formation potential is generally higher), which indicates a special role of non-coding DNA for orderly chromatin organization. The chromatin condensation and nuclear size are supposed to be key parameters that accommodate the effects of both genome size and GC content and connect them with metabolic intensity. Our data suggest that the reptilian-birds clade evolved special relationships among these parameters, whereas mammals preserved the amphibian-like relationships. Surprisingly, mammals, although acquiring a more complex general organization, seem to retain certain genome-related properties that are similar to amphibians. At the same time, the slope of regression between nucleosome formation potential and GC content is steeper in poikilothermal than in homeothermal genomes, which suggests that mammals and birds acquired certain common features of genomic organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16519230      PMCID: PMC1560010          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  60 in total

Review 1.  The maximum oxygen consumption and aerobic scope of birds and mammals: getting to the heart of the matter.

Authors:  C M Bishop
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

Authors:  E S Lander; L M Linton; B Birren; C Nusbaum; M C Zody; J Baldwin; K Devon; K Dewar; M Doyle; W FitzHugh; R Funke; D Gage; K Harris; A Heaford; J Howland; L Kann; J Lehoczky; R LeVine; P McEwan; K McKernan; J Meldrim; J P Mesirov; C Miranda; W Morris; J Naylor; C Raymond; M Rosetti; R Santos; A Sheridan; C Sougnez; Y Stange-Thomann; N Stojanovic; A Subramanian; D Wyman; J Rogers; J Sulston; R Ainscough; S Beck; D Bentley; J Burton; C Clee; N Carter; A Coulson; R Deadman; P Deloukas; A Dunham; I Dunham; R Durbin; L French; D Grafham; S Gregory; T Hubbard; S Humphray; A Hunt; M Jones; C Lloyd; A McMurray; L Matthews; S Mercer; S Milne; J C Mullikin; A Mungall; R Plumb; M Ross; R Shownkeen; S Sims; R H Waterston; R K Wilson; L W Hillier; J D McPherson; M A Marra; E R Mardis; L A Fulton; A T Chinwalla; K H Pepin; W R Gish; S L Chissoe; M C Wendl; K D Delehaunty; T L Miner; A Delehaunty; J B Kramer; L L Cook; R S Fulton; D L Johnson; P J Minx; S W Clifton; T Hawkins; E Branscomb; P Predki; P Richardson; S Wenning; T Slezak; N Doggett; J F Cheng; A Olsen; S Lucas; C Elkin; E Uberbacher; M Frazier; R A Gibbs; D M Muzny; S E Scherer; J B Bouck; E J Sodergren; K C Worley; C M Rives; J H Gorrell; M L Metzker; S L Naylor; R S Kucherlapati; D L Nelson; G M Weinstock; Y Sakaki; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; T Yada; A Toyoda; T Itoh; C Kawagoe; H Watanabe; Y Totoki; T Taylor; J Weissenbach; R Heilig; W Saurin; F Artiguenave; P Brottier; T Bruls; E Pelletier; C Robert; P Wincker; D R Smith; L Doucette-Stamm; M Rubenfield; K Weinstock; H M Lee; J Dubois; A Rosenthal; M Platzer; G Nyakatura; S Taudien; A Rump; H Yang; J Yu; J Wang; G Huang; J Gu; L Hood; L Rowen; A Madan; S Qin; R W Davis; N A Federspiel; A P Abola; M J Proctor; R M Myers; J Schmutz; M Dickson; J Grimwood; D R Cox; M V Olson; R Kaul; C Raymond; N Shimizu; K Kawasaki; S Minoshima; G A Evans; M Athanasiou; R Schultz; B A Roe; F Chen; H Pan; J Ramser; H Lehrach; R Reinhardt; W R McCombie; M de la Bastide; N Dedhia; H Blöcker; K Hornischer; G Nordsiek; R Agarwala; L Aravind; J A Bailey; A Bateman; S Batzoglou; E Birney; P Bork; D G Brown; C B Burge; L Cerutti; H C Chen; D Church; M Clamp; R R Copley; T Doerks; S R Eddy; E E Eichler; T S Furey; J Galagan; J G Gilbert; C Harmon; Y Hayashizaki; D Haussler; H Hermjakob; K Hokamp; W Jang; L S Johnson; T A Jones; S Kasif; A Kaspryzk; S Kennedy; W J Kent; P Kitts; E V Koonin; I Korf; D Kulp; D Lancet; T M Lowe; A McLysaght; T Mikkelsen; J V Moran; N Mulder; V J Pollara; C P Ponting; G Schuler; J Schultz; G Slater; A F Smit; E Stupka; J Szustakowki; D Thierry-Mieg; J Thierry-Mieg; L Wagner; J Wallis; R Wheeler; A Williams; Y I Wolf; K H Wolfe; S P Yang; R F Yeh; F Collins; M S Guyer; J Peterson; A Felsenfeld; K A Wetterstrand; A Patrinos; M J Morgan; P de Jong; J J Catanese; K Osoegawa; H Shizuya; S Choi; Y J Chen; J Szustakowki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Diversity and phylogenetic implications of CsCl profiles from rodent DNAs.

Authors:  C Douady; N Carels; O Clay; F Catzeflis; G Bernardi
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Bendable genes of warm-blooded vertebrates.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Nucleosome formation potential of eukaryotic DNA: calculation and promoters analysis.

Authors:  V G Levitsky; O A Podkolodnaya; N A Kolchanov; N L Podkolodny
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Translating the histone code.

Authors:  T Jenuwein; C D Allis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evolution of genome size: new approaches to an old problem.

Authors:  D A Petrov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 8.  Development of cardiac sensitivity to oxygen deficiency: comparative and ontogenetic aspects.

Authors:  B Ostadal; I Ostadalova; N S Dhalla
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  The sequence of the human genome.

Authors:  J C Venter; M D Adams; E W Myers; P W Li; R J Mural; G G Sutton; H O Smith; M Yandell; C A Evans; R A Holt; J D Gocayne; P Amanatides; R M Ballew; D H Huson; J R Wortman; Q Zhang; C D Kodira; X H Zheng; L Chen; M Skupski; G Subramanian; P D Thomas; J Zhang; G L Gabor Miklos; C Nelson; S Broder; A G Clark; J Nadeau; V A McKusick; N Zinder; A J Levine; R J Roberts; M Simon; C Slayman; M Hunkapiller; R Bolanos; A Delcher; I Dew; D Fasulo; M Flanigan; L Florea; A Halpern; S Hannenhalli; S Kravitz; S Levy; C Mobarry; K Reinert; K Remington; J Abu-Threideh; E Beasley; K Biddick; V Bonazzi; R Brandon; M Cargill; I Chandramouliswaran; R Charlab; K Chaturvedi; Z Deng; V Di Francesco; P Dunn; K Eilbeck; C Evangelista; A E Gabrielian; W Gan; W Ge; F Gong; Z Gu; P Guan; T J Heiman; M E Higgins; R R Ji; Z Ke; K A Ketchum; Z Lai; Y Lei; Z Li; J Li; Y Liang; X Lin; F Lu; G V Merkulov; N Milshina; H M Moore; A K Naik; V A Narayan; B Neelam; D Nusskern; D B Rusch; S Salzberg; W Shao; B Shue; J Sun; Z Wang; A Wang; X Wang; J Wang; M Wei; R Wides; C Xiao; C Yan; A Yao; J Ye; M Zhan; W Zhang; H Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; F Zhong; W Zhong; S Zhu; S Zhao; D Gilbert; S Baumhueter; G Spier; C Carter; A Cravchik; T Woodage; F Ali; H An; A Awe; D Baldwin; H Baden; M Barnstead; I Barrow; K Beeson; D Busam; A Carver; A Center; M L Cheng; L Curry; S Danaher; L Davenport; R Desilets; S Dietz; K Dodson; L Doup; S Ferriera; N Garg; A Gluecksmann; B Hart; J Haynes; C Haynes; C Heiner; S Hladun; D Hostin; J Houck; T Howland; C Ibegwam; J Johnson; F Kalush; L Kline; S Koduru; A Love; F Mann; D May; S McCawley; T McIntosh; I McMullen; M Moy; L Moy; B Murphy; K Nelson; C Pfannkoch; E Pratts; V Puri; H Qureshi; M Reardon; R Rodriguez; Y H Rogers; D Romblad; B Ruhfel; R Scott; C Sitter; M Smallwood; E Stewart; R Strong; E Suh; R Thomas; N N Tint; S Tse; C Vech; G Wang; J Wetter; S Williams; M Williams; S Windsor; E Winn-Deen; K Wolfe; J Zaveri; K Zaveri; J F Abril; R Guigó; M J Campbell; K V Sjolander; B Karlak; A Kejariwal; H Mi; B Lazareva; T Hatton; A Narechania; K Diemer; A Muruganujan; N Guo; S Sato; V Bafna; S Istrail; R Lippert; R Schwartz; B Walenz; S Yooseph; D Allen; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Blick; M Caminha; J Carnes-Stine; P Caulk; Y H Chiang; M Coyne; C Dahlke; A Deslattes Mays; M Dombroski; M Donnelly; D Ely; S Esparham; C Fosler; H Gire; S Glanowski; K Glasser; A Glodek; M Gorokhov; K Graham; B Gropman; M Harris; J Heil; S Henderson; J Hoover; D Jennings; C Jordan; J Jordan; J Kasha; L Kagan; C Kraft; A Levitsky; M Lewis; X Liu; J Lopez; D Ma; W Majoros; J McDaniel; S Murphy; M Newman; T Nguyen; N Nguyen; M Nodell; S Pan; J Peck; M Peterson; W Rowe; R Sanders; J Scott; M Simpson; T Smith; A Sprague; T Stockwell; R Turner; E Venter; M Wang; M Wen; D Wu; M Wu; A Xia; A Zandieh; X Zhu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of altitude and temperature on organ phenotypic plasticity along an altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  K A Hammond; J Szewczak; E Król
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  20 in total

1.  Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology?

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Bures; Petr Smarda; Tomás Pavlícek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  "Genome design" model: evidence from conserved intronic sequence in human-mouse comparison.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Palaeogenomics of pterosaurs and the evolution of small genome size in flying vertebrates.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The smallest avian genomes are found in hummingbirds.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory; Chandler B Andrews; Jimmy A McGuire; Christopher C Witt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genome size and wing parameters in passerine birds.

Authors:  Chandler B Andrews; Stuart A Mackenzie; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sauropod dinosaurs evolved moderately sized genomes unrelated to body size.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Stephen L Brusatte; Koen Stein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Determinants of inter-specific variation in basal metabolic rate.

Authors:  Craig R White; Michael R Kearney
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Metabolic 'engines' of flight drive genome size reduction in birds.

Authors:  Natalie A Wright; T Ryan Gregory; Christopher C Witt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Accelerated pathway evolution in mouse-like rodents involves cell cycle control.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 10.  Biological Scaling Problems and Solutions in Amphibians.

Authors:  Daniel L Levy; Rebecca Heald
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.