Literature DB >> 15297491

Clinical evaluation of the digene hybrid capture II test and the COBAS AMPLICOR monitor test for determination of hepatitis B virus DNA levels.

He-Jun Yuan1, Man-Fung Yuen, Danny Ka-Ho Wong, Simon Siu-Man Sum, Ching-Lung Lai.   

Abstract

The measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is important for the assessment of liver disease and treatment efficacy. Most commercially available assays for the determination of HBV DNA levels have limited linear ranges. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of the Digene Hybrid Capture II (Digene HC II assay) and the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor test (COBAS-AM assay), with special emphasis on anti-HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with low HBV DNA levels. A total of 425 Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B were recruited. A total of 107 patients were HBeAg positive, and 318 patients were HBeAg negative. The Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay had similar intra-assay and interassay variabilities. A total of 264 patients (62.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay, and 47 patients (11.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the COBAS-AM assay (P < 0.001). For the 161 patients with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay, the HBV DNA levels obtained by the Digene HC II assay and by the COBAS-AM assay showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.95; P < 0.001). The linear ranges of the Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay marginally overlapped. Before HBV DNA levels could be determined by the COBAS-AM assay, predilution had to be performed for 158 of 161 patients (98.1%) with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay and for 10 of 264 patients (3.8%) with HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay. The cost for assaying each serum sample by using different strategies was calculated. The COBAS-AM assay was more sensitive than the Digene HC II assay and more suitable for monitoring low levels of HBV viremia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15297491      PMCID: PMC497578          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3513-3517.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Second-generation Hybrid capture test and Amplicor monitor test generate highly correlated hepatitis B virus DNA levels.

Authors:  M Poljak; I J Marin; K Seme; V Brinovec; M Maticic; J Meglic-Volkar; G Lesnicar; A Vince
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.014

2.  Monitoring the virus load can predict the emergence of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus strains in renal transplantation patients during lamivudine therapy.

Authors:  E Puchhammer-Stöckl; C W Mandl; J Kletzmayr; H Holzmann; A Hofmann; S W Aberle; F X Heinz; B Watschinger; H Hofmann
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  A multicenter study evaluation of the digene hybrid capture II signal amplification technique for detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum samples and testing of EUROHEP standards.

Authors:  H G Niesters; M Krajden; L Cork; M de Medina; M Hill; E Fries; A D Osterhaus
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  What technique should be used for routine detection and quantification of HBV DNA in clinical samples?

Authors:  J M Pawlotsky; A Bastie; I Lonjon; J Rémiré; F Darthuy; C J Soussy; D Dhumeaux
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.014

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Automated quantitative analysis of hepatitis B virus DNA by using the Cobas Amplicor HBV monitor test.

Authors:  U Noborg; A Gusdal; E K Pisa; A Hedrum; M Lindh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of the second-generation digene hybrid capture assay with the branched-DNA assay for measurement of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum.

Authors:  S K Ho; T M Chan; I K Cheng; K N Lai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Molecular diagnosis of viral hepatitis.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Pawlotsky
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Factors associated with hepatitis B virus DNA breakthrough in patients receiving prolonged lamivudine therapy.

Authors:  M F Yuen; E Sablon; C K Hui; H J Yuan; H Decraemer; C L Lai
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Routine detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in clinical laboratories: performance of three commercial assays.

Authors:  J M Pawlotsky; A Bastie; C Hézode; I Lonjon; F Darthuy; J Rémiré; D Dhumeaux
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.014

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tenofovir (TDF) has stronger antiviral effect than adefovir (ADV) against lamivudine (LAM)-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Authors:  Hie-Won Hann; Hee Bok Chae; Stephen R Dunn
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction with the COBAS Amplicor test for quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum samples.

Authors:  Ming Shi; Yong Zhang; Ying-Hua Zhu; Jing Zhang; Wei-Jia Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nuclease-resistant double-stranded DNA controls or standards for hepatitis B virus nucleic acid amplification assays.

Authors:  Shuang Meng; Sien Zhan; Jinming Li
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  Dynamic comparison between Daan real-time PCR and Cobas TaqMan for quantification of HBV DNA levels in patients with CHB.

Authors:  Shao-hang Cai; Fang-fang Lv; Yong-hong Zhang; Ye-gui Jiang; Jie Peng
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.