Literature DB >> 10716334

Routine detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in clinical laboratories: performance of three commercial assays.

J M Pawlotsky1, A Bastie, C Hézode, I Lonjon, F Darthuy, J Rémiré, D Dhumeaux.   

Abstract

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes in molecular biology-based assays appear to be the most reliable methods for monitoring HBV infection and assessing responses to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three HBV-DNA detection and quantification assays currently used for the management of HBV-infected patients: a solution-hybridization assay based on hybrid-capture (Digene Hybrid-Capture, Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK); a signal-amplification assay based on 'branched-DNA' (bDNA) technology (Quantiplex HBV DNA, Bayer Diagnostics, Emeryville, CA); and a target-amplification assay based on competitive polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HBV Monitor, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA). The Monitor assay was significantly more sensitive than both the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. This better sensitivity appeared to be clinically relevant. The linear ranges of quantification in the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor methods were 6.5-9 log10 genome copies/ml, 6.5-9.5 log10 genome equivalents/ml, and 3-5.5 log10 genome copies/ml, respectively. However, the HBV-DNA units used in the three assays were not comparable. The specificity of the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor assays was 99.2% (95% confidence interval: 97.7-100.0%), 99.2% (97.7-100.0%), and 97.8% (95.3-100%), respectively. Their within-run coefficients of variation and log10 SDs were 5.5% (+/- 0.025 log10 copies/ml), 6.7% (+/- 0.029 log10 Eq/ml) and 21.0% (+/- 0.093 log10 copies/ml), respectively. Between-run coefficients of variation ranged from 4.4-39.1%, 5-39.5%, and 17.8-96.1%, respectively. The competitive PCR-based Monitor assay appears to be significantly more sensitive but slightly less specific and reproducible than the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. Given their respective performance, these three assays should be used in complementary fashion in the management of HBV-infected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10716334     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(99)00149-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of real-time PCR assays for monitoring serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels during antiviral therapy.

Authors:  Chee-Kin Hui; Scott Bowden; Hai-Ying Zhang; Anita Wong; Sharon Lewin; Frank Rousseau; Herve Mommeja-Marin; Nikki P Lee; John M Luk; Stephen Locarnini; Nancy Leung; Nikolai V Naoumov; George K K Lau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative evaluation of semiautomated COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis B virus (HBV) monitor test and manual microwell plate-based AMPLICOR HBV MONITOR test.

Authors:  I J Marin; M Poljak; K Seme; J Meglic-Volkar; M Maticic; G Lesnicar; V Brinovec
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Hepatitis B surface antigen: association with sustained response to peginterferon alfa-2a in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients.

Authors:  Teerha Piratvisuth; Patrick Marcellin; Matei Popescu; Hans-Peter Kapprell; Vivien Rothe; Zhi-Meng Lu
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Expertise of laboratories in viral load quantification, genotyping, and precore mutant determination for hepatitis B virus in a multicenter study.

Authors:  Syria Laperche; Vincent Thibault; Françoise Bouchardeau; Sophie Alain; Sandrine Castelain; Michelle Gassin; Marie Gueudin; Philippe Halfon; Sylvie Larrat; Françoise Lunel; Michèle Martinot-Peignoux; Bernard Mercier; Jean-Michel Pawlotsky; Bruno Pozzetto; Anne-Marie Roque-Afonso; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Karine Sauné; Jean-Jacques Lefrère
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Semiautomated quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in a routine diagnostic laboratory.

Authors:  H H Kessler; E Stelzl; E Daghofer; B I Santner; E Marth; H Lackner; R E Stauber
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2000-09

6.  Designing primers from multiple sequences using Matchup program to improve detection of hepatitis B virus by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  So Young Jang; Mi Suk Kim; Min Seok Park; Keon Myung Lee; Hwan Won Chung; Jongsik Chun; Chan Hee Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  New enzyme immunoassay for detection of hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBcAg) and relation between levels of HBcAg and HBV DNA.

Authors:  Tatsuji Kimura; Akinori Rokuhara; Akihiro Matsumoto; Shintaro Yagi; Eiji Tanaka; Kendo Kiyosawa; Noboru Maki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Performance of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan real-time PCR assay for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification.

Authors:  Stéphane Chevaliez; Magali Bouvier-Alias; Syria Laperche; Jean-Michel Pawlotsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Multicenter evaluation of the VERSANT hepatitis B virus DNA 3.0 assay.

Authors:  Joseph D C Yao; Marcel G H M Beld; Lynette Lin Ean Oon; Christopher H Sherlock; Jeffrey Germer; Sandra Menting; Su Yun Se Thoe; Linda Merrick; Rainer Ziermann; Johan Surtihadi; H James Hnatyszyn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Management of chronic hepatitis B: consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Morris Sherman; Stephen Shafran; Kelly Burak; Karen Doucette; Winnie Wong; Nigel Girgrah; Eric Yoshida; Eberhard Renner; Philip Wong; Marc Deschênes
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.