Literature DB >> 15289472

Segmental phylogenetic relationships of inbred mouse strains revealed by fine-scale analysis of sequence variation across 4.6 mb of mouse genome.

Kelly A Frazer1, Claire M Wade, David A Hinds, Nila Patil, David R Cox, Mark J Daly.   

Abstract

High-density SNP screening of panels of inbred mouse strains has been proposed as a method to accelerate the identification of genes associated with complex biomedical phenotypes. To evaluate the potential of these studies, a more detailed understanding of the fine structure of sequence variation across inbred mouse strains is needed. Here, we use high-density oligonucleotide arrays to discover an extremely dense set of SNPs in 13 classical and two wild-derived inbred strains in five genomic intervals totaling 4.6 Mb of DNA sequence, and then analyze the segmental haplotype structure defined by these high-density SNPs. This analysis reveals segments ranging from 12 to 608 kb in length within which the inbred strains have a simple and distinct phylogenetic relationship with typically two or three clades accounting for the 13 classical strains examined. The phylogenetic relationships among strains change abruptly and unpredictably from segment to segment, and are distinct in each of the five genomic regions examined. The data suggest that at least 12 strains would need to be resequenced for exhaustive SNP discovery in every region of the mouse genome, that approximately 97% of the variation among inbred strains is ancestral (between clades) and approximately 3% private (within clades), and provides critical insights into the proposed use of panels of inbred strains to identify genes underlying quantitative trait loci. Copyright 2004 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15289472      PMCID: PMC509258          DOI: 10.1101/gr.2627804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  10 in total

1.  Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21.

Authors:  N Patil; A J Berno; D A Hinds; W A Barrett; J M Doshi; C R Hacker; C R Kautzer; D H Lee; C Marjoribanks; D P McDonough; B T Nguyen; M C Norris; J B Sheehan; N Shen; D Stern; R P Stokowski; D J Thomas; M O Trulson; K R Vyas; K A Frazer; S P Fodor; D R Cox
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome.

Authors:  Claire M Wade; Edward J Kulbokas; Andrew W Kirby; Michael C Zody; James C Mullikin; Eric S Lander; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis.

Authors:  S P Fodor; J L Read; M C Pirrung; L Stryer; A T Lu; D Solas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Accessing genetic information with high-density DNA arrays.

Authors:  M Chee; R Yang; E Hubbell; A Berno; X C Huang; D Stern; J Winkler; D J Lockhart; M S Morris; S P Fodor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.

Authors:  D G Wang; J B Fan; C J Siao; A Berno; P Young; R Sapolsky; G Ghandour; N Perkins; E Winchester; J Spencer; L Kruglyak; L Stein; L Hsie; T Topaloglou; E Hubbell; E Robinson; M Mittmann; M S Morris; N Shen; D Kilburn; J Rioux; C Nusbaum; S Rozen; T J Hudson; R Lipshutz; M Chee; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Large-scale discovery and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the mouse.

Authors:  K Lindblad-Toh; E Winchester; M J Daly; D G Wang; J N Hirschhorn; J P Laviolette; K Ardlie; D E Reich; E Robinson; P Sklar; N Shah; D Thomas; J B Fan; T Gingeras; J Warrington; N Patil; T J Hudson; E S Lander
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Genealogies of mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  J A Beck; S Lloyd; M Hafezparast; M Lennon-Pierce; J T Eppig; M F Festing; E M Fisher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Active conservation of noncoding sequences revealed by three-way species comparisons.

Authors:  I Dubchak; M Brudno; G G Loots; L Pachter; C Mayor; E M Rubin; K A Frazer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis defines haplotype patterns in mouse.

Authors:  Tim Wiltshire; Mathew T Pletcher; Serge Batalov; S Whitney Barnes; Lisa M Tarantino; Michael P Cooke; Hua Wu; Kevin Smylie; Andrey Santrosyan; Neal G Copeland; Nancy A Jenkins; Francis Kalush; Richard J Mural; Richard J Glynne; Steve A Kay; Mark D Adams; Colin F Fletcher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  36 in total

1.  Strain screen and haplotype association mapping of wheel running in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J Timothy Lightfoot; Larry Leamy; Daniel Pomp; Michael J Turner; Anthony A Fodor; Amy Knab; Robert S Bowen; David Ferguson; Trudy Moore-Harrison; Alicia Hamilton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-10

2.  A high-resolution multistrain haplotype analysis of laboratory mouse genome reveals three distinctive genetic variation patterns.

Authors:  Jinghui Zhang; Kent W Hunter; Michael Gandolph; William L Rowe; Richard P Finney; Jenny M Kelley; Michael Edmonson; Kenneth H Buetow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  18th international mouse genome conference.

Authors:  Amy C Lossie; Thomas P Meehan; Andrew Castillo; Lihua Zheng; Keith C Weiser; Mark A Strivens; Monica J Justice
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Two quantitative trait loci for prepulse inhibition of startle identified on mouse chromosome 16 using chromosome substitution strains.

Authors:  Tracey L Petryshen; Andrew Kirby; Ronald P Hammer; Shaun Purcell; Sinead B O'Leary; Jonathan B Singer; Annie E Hill; Joseph H Nadeau; Mark J Daly; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sequencing multiple and diverse rice varieties. Connecting whole-genome variation with phenotypes.

Authors:  Kenneth L McNally; Richard Bruskiewich; David Mackill; C Robin Buell; Jan E Leach; Hei Leung
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Prospects for association mapping in classical inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur; Michael Place
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Complex genetic architecture revealed by analysis of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in chromosome substitution strains and F2 crosses.

Authors:  Ioannis M Stylianou; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Keith DiPetrillo; Naoki Ishimori; Renhua Li; Beverly Paigen; Gary Churchill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Joint estimates of quantitative trait locus effect and frequency using synthetic recombinant populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stuart J Macdonald; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Finding the molecular basis of complex genetic variation in humans and mice.

Authors:  Richard Mott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  An imputed genotype resource for the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Jin P Szatkiewicz; Glen L Beane; Yueming Ding; Lucie Hutchins; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.