Literature DB >> 1528703

On the variety of percepts associated with dichoptic viewing of dissimilar monocular stimuli.

Y Yang1, D Rose, R Blake.   

Abstract

Upon dichoptic viewing of dissimilar patterns, several distinct perceptual states may be experienced over time. One state is exclusive monocular dominance, wherein the view of only one eye is seen in its entirety for some period of time. Another state is characterized by a mosaic-like college consisting of portions of the view of each eye. Two other states involve simultaneous perception of both monocular images in their entirety. In one of these states, the two monocular stimuli appear to be superimposed without depth (a phenomenon we shall term 'superimposition'). In the other state, the two monocular stimuli appear to be located at different depth planes (which we shall term 'transparency'). This paper documents the stimulus conditions favoring these various perceptual states. Exclusive monocular dominance occurs most often when the two eyes view dissimilar patterns with the same spatial-frequency content, particularly when both patterns consist of low spatial frequencies. Superimposition also occurs most often when the two eyes view the same spatial frequencies, but predominantly when those spatial frequencies are high. Transparency is favored when the spatial-frequency difference between the eyes is great, particularly when the view of one eye consists of high spatial-frequency information.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1528703     DOI: 10.1068/p210047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; P van Hof; M J van der Smagt; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Brascamp; Joel Pearson; Raymond van Ee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Motion perception: from phi to omega.

Authors:  D Rose; R Blake
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Single units and conscious vision.

Authors:  N K Logothetis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.

Authors:  J W Brascamp; J Pearson; R Blake; A V van den Berg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.