Literature DB >> 15286185

Overexpectation: response loss during sustained stimulus compounding in the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation.

E James Kehoe1, Natasha E White.   

Abstract

Rabbits were given reinforced training of the nictitating membrane (NM) response using separate conditioned stimuli (CSs), which were a tone, light, and/or tactile vibration. Then, two CSs were compounded and given further pairings with the unconditioned stimulus (US). Evidence of both overexpectation and summation effects appeared. That is, responding to the individual CSs declined despite their continued pairing with the US on compound trials (overexpectation), and responding on the compound trials was greater than responding to the individual CSs (summation). The response loss appeared regardless of the testing regime, that is, whether the test presentations of the individual CSs were themselves reinforced (Experiment 2), not reinforced (Experiment 1), or deferred until the end of compound training (Experiment 2). The results are discussed with respect to the roles of excitatory versus inhibitory processes, elemental versus configural processes, and the possible roles of cerebellar and hippocampal pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15286185      PMCID: PMC498335          DOI: 10.1101/lm.77604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  39 in total

1.  Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  A P Weible; M D McEchron; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Neurobiology of Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  S Maren
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 3.  Parallels between cerebellum- and amygdala-dependent conditioning.

Authors:  Javier F Medina; J Christopher Repa; Michael D Mauk; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

6.  Extinction revisited: similarities between extinction and reductions in US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  E James Kehoe; Natasha E White
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

7.  Evidence for a GABA-mediated cerebellar inhibition of the inferior olive in the cat.

Authors:  G Andersson; M Garwicz; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Compound conditioned emotional response conditioning with differentially salient elements in rats.

Authors:  L J Kamin; S J Gaioni
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-09

9.  The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  E F Kremer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1978-01

10.  Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits.

Authors:  J R Moyer; R A Deyo; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  3 in total

1.  Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Renewal after overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Simple and complex spike firing patterns in Purkinje cells during classical conditioning.

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.