Literature DB >> 18931885

Simple and complex spike firing patterns in Purkinje cells during classical conditioning.

Anders Rasmussen1, Dan-Anders Jirenhed, Germund Hesslow.   

Abstract

Classical blink conditioning is known to depend critically on the cerebellum and the relevant circuitry is gradually being unravelled. Several lines of evidence support the theory that the conditioned stimulus is transmitted by mossy fibers to the cerebellar cortex whereas the unconditioned stimulus is transmitted by climbing fibers. This view has been dramatically confirmed by recent Purkinje cell recordings during training with a classical conditioning paradigm. We have tracked the activity of single Purkinje cells with microelectrodes for several hours in decerebrate ferrets during learning, extinction, and relearning. Paired peripheral forelimb and periocular stimulation, as well as paired direct stimulation of cerebellar afferent pathways (mossy and climbing fibers) causes acquisition of a pause response in Purkinje cell simple spike firing. This conditioned Purkinje cell response has temporal properties that match those of the behavioral response. Its latency varies with the interstimulus interval and it responds to manipulations of the conditioned stimulus in the same way that the blink does. Complex spike firing largely mirrors the simple spike behavior. We have previously suggested that cerebellar learning is subject to a negative feedback control via the inhibitory nucleo-olivary pathway. As the Purkinje cell learns to respond to the conditioned stimulus with a suppression of simple spikes, disinhibition of anterior interpositus neurons would be expected to cause inhibition of the inferior olive. Observations of complex spike firing in the Purkinje cells during conditioning and extinction confirm this prediction. Before training, complex spikes are unaffected or facilitated by the conditioned stimulus, but as the simple spike pause response develops, spontaneous and stimulus-evoked complex spikes are also strongly suppressed by the conditioned stimulus. After extinction of the simple spike pause response, the complex spikes reappear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931885     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-008-0068-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  17 in total

1.  Extinction of conditioned blink responses by cerebello-olivary pathway stimulation.

Authors:  Fredrik Bengtsson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Pär Svensson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Cerebellum and conditioned reflexes.

Authors:  C H Yeo; G Hesslow
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus.

Authors:  M D Mauk; J E Steinmetz; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evidence for a GABA-mediated cerebellar inhibition of the inferior olive in the cat.

Authors:  G Andersson; M Garwicz; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Quantitative relationship between simple spike firing pattern and evoked complex spikes of cerebellar Purkinje cells after acute chemical destruction of the inferior olive [proceedings].

Authors:  F Colin; J Desclin; J Manil
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response.

Authors:  D A McCormick; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Correspondence between climbing fibre input and motor output in eyeblink-related areas in cat cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  G Hesslow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Overexpectation: response loss during sustained stimulus compounding in the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation.

Authors:  E James Kehoe; Natasha E White
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 10.  Cerebellar control of the inferior olive.

Authors:  Fredrik Bengtsson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.648

View more
  29 in total

1.  Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Number of spikes in climbing fibers determines the direction of cerebellar learning.

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Pär Svensson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Clusters of cerebellar Purkinje cells control their afferent climbing fiber discharge.

Authors:  Joseph Chaumont; Nicolas Guyon; Antoine M Valera; Guillaume P Dugué; Daniela Popa; Paikan Marcaggi; Vanessa Gautheron; Sophie Reibel-Foisset; Stéphane Dieudonné; Aline Stephan; Michel Barrot; Jean-Christophe Cassel; Jean-Luc Dupont; Frédéric Doussau; Bernard Poulain; Fekrije Selimi; Clément Léna; Philippe Isope
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cerebellar cortex contributions to the expression and timing of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tobin Davis; Tatsuya Ohyama; Frank Riusech; William L Nores; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cerebellar and extracerebellar involvement in mouse eyeblink conditioning: the ACDC model.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Relating cerebellar purkinje cell activity to the timing and amplitude of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Andrei Khilkevich; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Spike-coding mechanisms of cerebellar temporal processing in classical conditioning and voluntary movements.

Authors:  Kenji Yamaguchi; Yoshio Sakurai
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Cerebellar inhibitory output shapes the temporal dynamics of its somatosensory inferior olivary input.

Authors:  Roni Hogri; Eyal Segalis; Matti Mintz
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Sensory prediction or motor control? Application of marr-albus type models of cerebellar function to classical conditioning.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; John Porrill; Christopher H Yeo; Paul Dean
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Mechanisms for motor timing in the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Germund Hesslow; Javier F Medina
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.