Literature DB >> 24431701

Effect of the impression margin thickness on the linear accuracy of impression and stone dies: an in vitro study.

Y G Naveen1, Raghunath Patil1.   

Abstract

The space available for impression material in gingival sulcus immediately after the removal of retraction cord has been found to be 0.3-0.4 mm. However after 40 s only 0.2 mm of the retracted space is available. This is of concern when impression of multiple abutments is to be made. Hence a study was planned to determine the minimum width of the retracted sulcus necessary to obtain a good impression. Five metal dies were machined to accurately fit a stainless steel block with a square cavity in the center with spaces, 1 mm deep and of varying widths (0.11-0.3 mm) away from the block. Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were made and poured using a high strength stone. Using traveling microscope, length and widths of abutment, impression and die were measured and compared for linear accuracy and completeness of impression. Results showed 1.5-3 times greater mean distortion and larger coefficient of variance in the 0.11 mm group than in the wider sulcular groups. ANOVA test for distortion also showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). 75 % of impressions in 0.11 mm group were defective compared to less than 25 % of impressions in other width groups. It is not always possible to predictably obtain accurate impressions in sulcus width of 0.11 mm or lesser. Dimensionally accurate and defect free impressions were obtained in sulcus width of 0.15 mm and wider. Hence clinicians must choose retraction methods to obtain a width greater than 0.35 mm. Further immediate loading of the impression material after cord removal may improve accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dies; Impression margins; Sulcular width

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431701      PMCID: PMC3602526          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0160-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  18 in total

1.  Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.

Authors:  J Tinschert; G Natt; W Mautsch; H Spiekermann; K J Anusavice
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.

Authors:  S H Hung; J H Purk; D E Tira; J D Eick
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width.

Authors:  H Baharav; B Z Laufer; Y Langer; H S Cardash
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making.

Authors:  B Z Laufer; H Baharav; Y Langer; H S Cardash
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials.

Authors:  B Z Laufer; H Baharav; Y Ganor; H S Cardash
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.

Authors:  S O Hondrum
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  The linear accuracy of impressions and stone dies as affected by the thickness of the impression margin.

Authors:  B Z Laufer; H Baharav; H S Cardash
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part II: Polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane.

Authors:  A M Lacy; H Fukui; T Bellman; M D Jendresen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  Pantira Aimjirakul; Takayuki Masuda; Hidekazu Takahashi; Hiroyuki Miura
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.

Authors:  Haim Baharav; Irit Kupershmidt; Ben-Zion Laufer; Harold S Cardash
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.