Literature DB >> 1527586

Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception.

C E Connor1, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

A previous study showed that roughness perception may depend on either temporal or spatial variations in firing rate among cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. The present study was designed to distinguish between these hypotheses. Plastic surfaces embossed with patterns of dots designed to produce predictable alterations in temporal and spatial firing rate variation were used as stimuli in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. Subjective roughness magnitudes obtained from psychophysical experiments fitted the predictions of the spatial but not the temporal hypothesis. In the neurophysiological experiments, the stimuli were scanned across the receptive fields of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. Firing rate variation in the neural responses was measured using a range of temporal and spatial filters. Temporal variation was not correlated with roughness magnitude. Spatial variation, on a scale of 1-2 mm (one to two receptor spacings), was closely correlated with roughness.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1527586      PMCID: PMC6575720     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  53 in total

1.  Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Authors:  C J Cascio; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics.

Authors:  Kenneth O Johnson; Steven S Hsiao; Takashi Yoshioka
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The vibrations of texture.

Authors:  Sliman J BensmaIa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; James C Craig; Graham C Beck; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Surface texture can bias tactile form perception.

Authors:  Masashi Nakatani; Robert D Howe; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Context effects in haptic perception of roughness.

Authors:  Mirela Kahrimanovic; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.