Literature DB >> 19156403

Context effects in haptic perception of roughness.

Mirela Kahrimanovic1, Wouter M Bergmann Tiest, Astrid M L Kappers.   

Abstract

The influence of temporal and spatial context during haptic roughness perception was investigated in two experiments. Subjects examined embossed dot patterns of varying average dot distance. A two-alternative forced-choice procedure was used to measure discrimination thresholds and biases. In Experiment 1, subjects had to discriminate between two stimuli that were presented simultaneously to adjacent fingers, after adaptation of one of these fingers. The results showed that adaptation to a rough surface decreased the perceived roughness of a surface subsequently scanned with the adapted finger, whereas adaptation to a smooth surface increased the perceived roughness (i.e. contrast after effect). In Experiment 2, subjects discriminated between subsequent test stimuli, while the adjacent finger was stimulated simultaneously. The results showed that perceived roughness of the test stimulus shifted towards the roughness of the adjacent stimulus (i.e. assimilation effect). These contextual effects are explained by structures of cortical receptive fields. Analogies with comparable effects in the visual system are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19156403     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1697-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex.

Authors:  V Dragoi; J Sharma; M Sur
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A central mechanism of chromatic contrast.

Authors:  S K Shevell; J Wei
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Central neural mechanisms contributing to the perception of tactile roughness.

Authors:  C Elaine Chapman; François Tremblay; Wan Jiang; Loïc Belingard; El-Mehdi Meftah
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.

Authors:  C E Connor; S S Hsiao; J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Structure of receptive fields in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex in the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.

Authors:  D T Blake; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system.

Authors:  C Blakemore; J P Muncey; R M Ridley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Interaction between afferent input from fingers in human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  N Forss; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-07-10       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Convergence in the somatosensory pathway between cutaneous afferents from the index and middle fingers in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D Burke; B B McKeon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neuronal activity in the second somatosensory cortex of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of gratings.

Authors:  R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Tactile information affects alternating visual percepts during binocular rivalry using naturalistic objects.

Authors:  Mikoto Ono; Nobuyuki Hirose; Shuji Mori
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  Integration of vibrotactile frequency information beyond the mechanoreceptor channel and somatotopy.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effect of Visual Information on Active Touch During Mirror Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Narumi Katsuyama; Eriko Kikuchi-Tachi; Nobuo Usui; Hideyuki Yoshizawa; Aya Saito; Masato Taira
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  A Theoretical Framework of Haptic Processing in Automotive User Interfaces and Its Implications on Design and Engineering.

Authors:  Stefan Josef Breitschaft; Stella Clarke; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-26

5.  Too fat to fit through the door: first evidence for disturbed body-scaled action in anorexia nervosa during locomotion.

Authors:  Anouk Keizer; Monique A M Smeets; H Chris Dijkerman; Siarhei A Uzunbajakau; Annemarie van Elburg; Albert Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.